Allow me to summarize, liberal logic works this way:
Oppose anything that Bush does, regardless if it is good or bad because liberals have absolutely nothing to offer but socialism.
Focus nothing but negativity towards any capitalist icon or symbol. Call all people who oppose socialism as stupid, greedy and evil. The war in Iraq has been difficult, so if liberals and their advocate news agencies focus only on negativity, the liberal nation will accept only the partial picture and buy into whatever negativity is offered by liberals.
So, the liberal logic is- if the Iraq war has gone badly, then socialism is validated; all capitalists are criminals & the America that our WW2 veterans fought to give us, is now a criminal and evil way of life.
The socialists and communists have infiltrated every liberal cause and selfish interest group & most liberals don't even know it. No one will accept the liberal point of view if it's presented honestly, they rely on deception and lies to fool people to jump on the socilalist bandwagon.
2007-10-15 12:06:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
Your assessment to how WW2 used to be shorter then this Iraqi battle. Isn't that evidence this battle is a failure and useless? We ruled two international locations in a span of four years throughout WW2, however at present, regardless of our complex navy science and extra time then WW2 lasted, are nonetheless not able to comfy Baghdad or another fundamental town in Iraq. Doesn't that say anything? BTW, this battle is not approximately freedom. Our freedom wasn't threatened through Iraq. Our loss of help for this battle manner not anything at the battle entrance. The extra occasions I say this battle is failure is beside the point. It's now not like me announcing that a few how makes the enemy's guns more potent and permits them to kill extra troops. It does not imply that on account that 70% of the nation is towards the battle that abruptly our troops are forgetting easy methods to battle and are fitting less difficult ambitions for the insurgents. That's beside the point. THAT IS FOX NEWS / PRO-WAR / REPUBLICAN PROPAGANDA. Do you realize what propaganda is? You must appear it up. Then you could see how you will have been coerced into beleiving that this battle is a pleasant factor for everybody concerned, on account that it is not. Iraq isn't benifiting, our troops aren't benifiting and our nation isn't beniftiing. Coincedently, the one individuals profiting from the battle are the leaders which are combating to hold the troops in Iraq. Also coincedental is those identical individuals pushing the American individuals to help their battle are making fine gains from their ties and investments with safety organizations equivalent to Haliburton. A blind guy can see this. You have two offerings: A) Either begin considering what you assert in public on account that this battle is an embarassement to our nation. or B) If you help this battle, then what the hell are you doing right here? Sign up for navy, head over to Iraq, and desire you do not die for not anything. My wager is you're a hypocrite and p@ssy and can simply maintaining speakme. You are like that child from top tuition that might shoot his mouth off after which say matters like "My brother will kick your a**".
2016-09-05 10:22:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
So why doesn't Fox Noise show the stories you refer to? The BBC doesn't report them either, nor does, al-Jazeera, Pravda, Krashaya Zvezda, not one recognized legitimate news organization with a presence in Iraq, with the ability to factually report this stuff, has mentioned one word about a school being built, or a hospital which is now open fulltime in Baghdad, or how Baghdad has running water everywhere now (they don't nor do they have power more than a few hours a day), etc.
Why isn't "Stars and Stripes" reporting these stories? Are THEY part of the bias as well?
Are they ALSO part of the "liberal left-wing bias" in national media?
You say there are "a lot of things", but you don't give examples, you don't supply links proving your points and you just waste your time. Here's the stories I see:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/25/iraq.lugar/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=3286183
http://www.arabnews.com/?page=4§ion=0&article=46915&d=17&m=6&y=2004&pix=world.jpg&category=World
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092601721.html
2007-10-15 11:22:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Don't you realize Fox News doesn't show you Everything, because they want you to support the war???
I know people in the military too. There are a lot of things they don't want to show us because conservative Bush lover Fox News and other editorializing news outlets want you to blindly support Bush and the war.
Fox News and conservative talk radio are obviously, intentionally biased and use slander and misdirection to get you to turn off your brain so that Bush administration can more easily use the fear of terrorism to get you to support them. Since I've stopped watching Fox News, and starting watching CNN again, CNN seems quite benign in comparison. They just seem to sensalize the news to hook you in and their liberal bias seems more unintentional.
Fox News: "We'll tell you what you need to know so you don't have to think about it."
CNN: "OMG!!! You won't believe what happened."
I find its easier to distill the truth from CNN.
2007-10-15 09:47:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Well, yeah, I know it. I know people in the military over there, too. They're very annoyed with the way most news organizations are covering the war because the military is doing a lot of good in Iraq, but they don't show you that. They show only the bad things that are going on, especially when it involves the troops. Liberals don't want to believe that and CNN plays right into it.
2007-10-15 09:37:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
Dude, CNN is far from Liberal. They're fairly balanced, but they still lean right. Allot of the educated Conservatives I know watch CNN. And there's no news story that could EVER make me support a war.
2007-10-15 09:50:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
The "good" is far outweighed by the bad, and the Occupation is not going well at all. There are too many serious issues over there that need to be fixed to ignore in order to show some patrio-fascist pablum photo-ops of Iraqi children handing out flowers to their "liberators".
2007-10-15 09:39:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
this is a dumb question, there are departments under the Bush admin who's sole job is to alter and censor information in a way that will BENEFIT the war effort...even if it means they have to be rhetorical...they will. The FBI payed off some homeless guys in NY to pretend to be members of Al Qaeda to stir up public opinion for the war...theyve also paid students to pretend to be communists...Ever heard of reverse psychology? Believe me CNN is anything but liberal
2007-10-15 09:41:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋
Oh well, do you know of any reporters who want to just casually walk down the street while bombs are going off and people are blowing themselves up to ask the passer-bys how the war has benefited them?
2007-10-15 09:42:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by MadLibs 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Neither do alot of other news media. It is not exclusive to CNN.
2007-10-15 09:36:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Spirish_1 5
·
6⤊
2⤋