English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have to repost because so many of you didn't understand the question.while calling my opinion racist most of you basically said the alternative to condi or clarence was a counter culture thug keeping it real.I like many others consider myself a educated, professional, moderate trying to build bridges where hannity and limbaugh have divided us. In trying to understand conservative thinking (oxymoron) i asked why black people in this administration have a proven track record of cosigning whatever their bosses say. there is no leadership from condi or clarence they blindy follow despite their stellar educations and reputations. is it to much to ask them to think and speak for themselves instead of high ranked puppets.

2007-10-15 07:19:48 · 13 answers · asked by doc_of_three 2 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

Codi and Clearnance follow the Neo-Con agenda like scared slaves. I know an educated black guy named Micheal Dyson, one of the smartest cultural/political analysis of our time if not the smartest. He expresses articulately with facts and logic what is wrong with the status quo in regards to race. This scares the conservative republicans so they quickly pull out there condi's and clearance's in order to debunk any logical argument in regards to the status quo and race.

2007-10-15 07:27:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 7

LOL, LMAO

Hannity and Limbaugh have devided us?

ANNNNNdddd MoveOn.org, Al Franken, Air America, Media Matters, George Soros, Alan Combs, Al Gore, Jane Fonda, Code Pink, Daily Kos, John Stewart, Sean Penn, Ed Begley, Bruce Springstien, Tim Russert, Walter Cronkite, The Huffington Post, The Slate and all the rest of the moral relativists in the left wing echo chamber have not?

That you insist black persons in a position of authority that agree with the administration's policy could not possibly be thinking for themselves is inherently racist and that fact is not going to change no matter how many times you post the question.

2007-10-15 07:37:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

"In trying to understand conservative thinking (oxymoron) i asked why black people in this administration have a proven track record of cosigning whatever their bosses say."

You see, you are, in a racist manner, cherry picking the black members of the administration and claiming they fall in lock step with the administration. I've got news for you: the black, white, yellow, brown, purple and tye dyed members of this administration are lock step with each other! To say it's only blacks being controlled is wrong. I dispute them being controlled or coerced, can they not make a decision themselves to agree? You are implying that they MUST deviate from what the administration wants in order to preserve their integrity, and allow no possibility for them to choose a like-minded solution that falls in line with this administration. Condi is not the boss, she would be expected to do what she's told. Clarence Thomas, like all SC judges, answers to no one but himself. If he's a Republican, it would be no surprise that he would side with them, and doing so doesn't imply that he's controlled. Republicans classically follow a chain of command, and even if they disagree they keep it silent and to themselves. This goes for all of them, not just the blacks.

2007-10-15 07:31:22 · answer #3 · answered by Pfo 7 · 4 0

no matter how you word it, it is a racist statement. to say that they do gwb bushs' bidding is one thing but to inject race into it only creates the divide you hold rush and sean responsible for. what about the dems then? the same questioned could be asked. there are more blacks in that demographic than on the reps side. you accuse condi and thomas of being bushs' lap dog because of their color. remove the color issue from your question and it could be any party. in your question you make sarcastic statements about the right yet you are trying to fix what rush and sean have broken. you are right there with them my friend if this is how you truly think.why not just call them "happy ******".

2007-10-15 08:36:03 · answer #4 · answered by BRYAN H 5 · 0 0

Well, first...this isn't a "conservative" administration, so I don't think you would get "conservative" thinking to defend. Secondly, this Administration has shown itself to be a team. I'm certain that there are disagreements, but they are obviously dealt within. Thirdly, Clarence Thomas isn't a part of this administration- he doesn't answer to the White House.
And so much more...

2007-10-15 07:39:10 · answer #5 · answered by Ghimraab 2 · 2 0

Obama's "careful attention" took too long. squaddies died because of the fact this knuckle-dragger could no longer make up his innovations! He gets no compliment from me for doing what he could have carried out a month in the past! according to danger if he hadn't spent all this time enjoying politics with the Afghanistan difficulty, a number of our courageous troops could nevertheless be alive right this moment. he's scum, straight forward and straightforward. BTW, the "surge" became into in Iraq, genius!

2016-10-09 06:53:19 · answer #6 · answered by mccaleb 3 · 0 0

To be a true Conservative, you cannot think.

You must become thought free. And then tune into Fox News, they get paid for doing your thinking for you.

Here is your prescription:
Watch Fox News
Listen to Rush Limbaugh
Read Ann Coulter's books
Read Bill O'reilley's book
Listen to Glenn Beck

2007-10-15 07:56:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Have you ever thought that maybe they are thinking for themselves, and agree with Bush. They have seen a lot more information than we ever will.

Why is that because they are "cosigning whatever their bosses say" means that they are puppets?!? Have you ever thought that maybe they are just conservative, and are logical and realists vs. idealists?

2007-10-15 07:30:59 · answer #8 · answered by vinsa1981 3 · 5 1

I'm so glad you told us that you were an educated,moderate, professional. Otherwise I might have categorized you as a pretentious fool!

2007-10-15 08:33:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Why don't you talk about Alphonso Jackson?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/ajackson-bio.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphonso_Jackson

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2004-09-12-black-leaders_x.htm

http://www.hud.gov/offices/cir/test070920.cfm

2007-10-15 07:34:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If one cannot be civil(oxymoron) one does not deserve an answer. Peace

2007-10-15 07:37:30 · answer #11 · answered by PARVFAN 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers