It's all over the news, rice trying to talk the two sides into talks here in the US. It will cost us Tax payers a horrendous amount of money, but can it lead to anything, without at least an idea of a plan, what to achieve? Or is it a much needed publicity stunt? What's your draw?
2007-10-15 07:11:22 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Unfrortunately, this is the ONLy Sect. of State we've ever had, that has NEVER HAD A PLAN !!!
2007-10-15 07:14:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's been talk of a Palestinian state numerous times in recent years and every time it's been said I have been skeptical. However, lately, there have reportedly been talks of handing over half of Jerusalem to the Palestinians, and it doesn't appear to be mere speculation. A meeting IN the USA with the two sides doesn't happen for no reason.
2007-10-15 14:27:40 · answer #2 · answered by Joe from WI 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is trying to get Israel to give up more land they fought for. She would ultimately like to see Jerusalem divided and a Palestinian state. I'm very sorry to know she is an American, with that agenda.
2007-10-15 15:01:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well -- if she is acting as mediator -- then she probably doesn't need an agenda, other than trying to help.
The two sides already have their own agendas and goals. A mediator just helps them reach a compromise -- and from the US perspective -- reaching any compromise that involves less gunfire would be a good thing.
2007-10-15 14:31:10 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋