Man my questions are valid, I don't have the authority to judge anyone or anything. I had a good friend that was quite premisqueous in a selective way and that's cool. But this person regarded themselves as that. Well in other terms, SL*T, whore, gigalo, etc. We can't take two wires with a negative charge and plug them and expect a flow. We have tried to bend the laws of this place for a long time and that's fine, great, but lets call it thatl; even (if you believe in one) the creator has to most of the time abide by these laws;otherwise the system is unbalanced. If anyone's seen Monty Pythons, "Life of Brian", a character that is a member of the resistance against the romans: "Judaen People's Front" or is it "People's Front of Judea"? "Loretta" is a "Woman trapped inside a mans body" and wnats to have the rights to have babys, and the argument is that Loretta can't and then why ask for the right? CON'T>
2007-10-15 06:19:10 · 3 answers · asked by diviner2025 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
WOW.......was there a question in all of that?
2007-10-15 08:14:15 · answer #1 · answered by Victhechic 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hard to understand exactly what you are asking -- but from your question above, you seem to make certain assumptions that not everyone would agree to.
First, that there is a Creator -- second, that the Creator follows certain rules/beliefs/whatever that you have proposed -- third, that mundane law needs to even take those religious beliefs into account in its decisions -- not everyone agrees with those premises.
Add insulting terminology -- or trying to assert that there is only one obviously true and valid answer to an emotionally charged issue -- and it's not surprising that many people would get emotionally riled up about such postings.
~~~~~~~~~~
EDIT: Looking at some of your recent questions, it seems the issue that people have taken affront to is some of your implications and assumptions (as they view them) regarding homosexuality and the validity of such relationships. Your questions could easily be viewed as attacks or disparaging -- and many people take offense when being told then are "unnatural" or that they should have less legal rights than others solely because they are different in some way.
2007-10-15 13:39:24 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I understand each individual word that you have written, however the random order in which you have used them has left me confused.
2007-10-15 13:24:44 · answer #3 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋