Many, many of our troops have died because this administration made a CHOICE to send them there with inferior technology and equipment. I don't care what spin you choose to put on it but this has been going on since long before the Dems took over congress.
2007-10-15 06:06:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by katydid 7
·
9⤊
4⤋
Don't be discouraged. Most of this crap is grandstanding. If you look over the past ten years every request for our soldiers has been passed. All of the funding requirements have been provided even with the appearance of disapproval by the left side. Those were not simple majority vote sessions they had to be overwhelming support. There is a lot of noise by the left in Congress but most of that is for show to keep support. They really are taking care of our soldiers a will continue no matter how long it takes.
2007-10-15 06:15:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by rance42 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
Why does the Democrat Party give off the vibe of...
Failure at all costs???
Bringing the troops home doesn't seem to be their only objective. They are willing to dig 100 years into the past to hobble the US military in Iraq. Why don't they come out and state the reasons they need the US to not only fail, but undeniably lose? Are they afraid they'd face wholesale rejection by the population if their true objectives were known???
2007-10-15 06:31:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by floatingbloatedcorpse 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
You pronounced, "i ought to verify no longer helping the conflict, it fairly is comprehensible, yet why might you no longer help the human beings battling and dropping their lives over there?" i think of the issue is that the people who don't help the troops can not see the bigger photograph and are unable to chop up the adult males and females battling the conflict from the guidelines that introduced the conflict. i think of, in case you ought to get the human beings with the signs and warning signs announcing "do no longer help the troops" to think of with reference to the human beings and not the coverage, you may discover that extra human beings help the troops than do no longer.
2016-12-14 18:31:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by pariasca 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The BS that they spoon out about it being such a bother to get a warrant 3 DAYS after the wiretapping starts is pure foolishness. They have only denied about 2 or 3 wiretaps since the program started, what's the big deal? I'm not worried about the wiretaps they do on foreigner terrorists, I'm worried about the wiretaps they do on American citizens. It's called oversight, and all government needs it or it gets too big for it's britches.
2007-10-15 06:14:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Perhaps, but they don't care about trivialities like that...
(sarcasim is heavy here)
The dems in general care little for consequences. The issues and intent of their legislation means more than what said legislation will actually accomplish.
The road to Hell is paved by ...
2007-10-15 06:13:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeff Engr 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
The Limbaugh/Coulter/Hannity/O'Reilly team doesn't give out points for finding new and inventive ways to bash liberals.
Just like the Moore/Franken/O'Donnel team doesn't give out points for finding new and inventive ways to bash Bush.
2007-10-15 06:11:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
there is no such party as the 'democrat' party and therefore no such thing as a democrat house.
whenever you see anyone substitute the word 'democrat' for the democratic party, it's a sure tell that the asker is a right wing shill.
that being said, if the turks are going to be such babies about the truth, then they were never our friends to begin with...
2007-10-15 06:06:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by nostradamus02012 7
·
3⤊
5⤋
Good hatchling. You are doing the work of our lord Ronnie God. It will be duly noted at his second coming from the planet Brain Surgery.
Ronnie God is Great!
2007-10-15 06:10:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
The Demos are panicking because things are calming down in Iraq at least for now. Could you imagine how demoralizing a win for the USA would be for them?
2007-10-15 06:09:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
4⤊
6⤋