tell me what she did or is going to do. why is she where she is?
2007-10-15 05:51:44 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She does a really good job of disregarding reports that say in simple English "the terrrorists are preparing to fly comercial jets into large buildings in the major cities" Then she lies about it and covers up her own misdeeds. She is a war criminal along with many in this current administration
2007-10-15 05:55:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Read newspaper, watch tv...or whatever you must do to get information- here's just a brief partial list:
She is a former tenured professor at Stanford University and later Provost (the youngest and first female/black person to hold the position),
She reopened nuclear negotiations with North Korea
She persuaded Bush to endorse similar negotiations that Britain, France, and Germany had initiated with Iran
She crafted the terms of a United Nations resolution to investigate war crimes in Sudan
She's been allowed to rev up the long-dormant machinery of diplomacy in a way that her predecessor, Colin Powell, never could.
She authored several book and numerous articles on foreign affairs issues while serving as a member of the Center for International Security and Arms Control
Director of Soviet and East European Affairs for the National Security Council
Also- she was a Founding Board member of the Center for a New Generation, an educational support fund for schools in East Palo Alto and East Menlo Park, California
She is very well educated-
Earned her bachelor's degree in political science, *** laude and Phi Beta Kappa, from the University of Denver in 1974; her master's from the University of Notre Dame in 1975; and her Ph.D. from the Graduate School of International Studies at the University of Denver in 1981. She is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and has been awarded honorary doctorates from Morehouse College in 1991, the University of Alabama in 1994, the University of Notre Dame in 1995, the National Defense University in 2002, the Mississippi College School of Law in 2003, the University of Louisville and Michigan State University in 2004
She has tremendous ability and intelligence, and the maturity of someone beyond her years, so if you're trying to discredit her, or underestimate her, you might want to take a minute and rethink your position.
She works hard to negotiate and bring about peace in a very troubled world- give the lady some credit!
Why exactly do you not respect about her? Her race, sex, or political affiliation...what? Or is it that she works for the current administration? Be honest and concise. I'm interested to know if you do more than just fill space.
2007-10-15 07:57:58 · answer #2 · answered by redmane_at_stargazer 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
combination in a bowl: 3 C mindless Loyalty a million TBS hollow teeth 2 C mendacity to congress with regard to the 911 memos a million C Gullibility 5 TBS determination a million oz..Stubbornness a million LB Brown rice put in appointed workplace and bake for 8 years.
2016-12-18 08:16:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Listen, I disagree with her 192% politically (that's measurable), but she is a well respected International Relations scholar with multiple publications about inner-Soviet (and post-Soviet) relationships. She was a professor at Stanford for a number of years. Her scholarship is fairly good, lengthy, and insightful (at times). And, I really think that she has matured substantially while being Secretary of State. She was very, very abstract and foolish as National Security Adviser to the President, she was bad her first two years as Secretary of State, but seems to actually be trying in the Middle East today. She is certainly qualified for the job of Secretary of State...but is she the best possible candidate? nope.
Having said how good of a scholar she is, the problem is that she is one who simply tries to apply abstract theories about how the world works in practice. This is a recipe for disaster and critical thinking is certainly absent in this instance.
2007-10-15 06:02:54 · answer #4 · answered by C.S. 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If she were a Democrat you would not criticize her. That is what is wrong with America today. The partisan Liberals are even worse than the Conservative attacks on Clinton 10 years ago.
2007-10-15 06:04:42 · answer #5 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Anybody who can spend her time going around the world in stiletto heels and not fall down has my respect.
2007-10-15 06:03:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let's ask Laura Bush. Apparently she's not too fond of Condi.
2007-10-15 05:56:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
She is probably one of the hardest working people on the planet. I can't believe you didn't know that. All a person needs to do is watch or read the news.
Not only does she work her *** off, she is a powerhouse. She is smart and the US owes her a great deal of gratitude.
2007-10-15 05:55:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
she is a very big plus for america and i think she could be swayed into either party
2007-10-15 08:18:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Other than taking care of their own agendas, I don't think any politico does anything for the common man who elected them into office.
2007-10-15 05:54:30 · answer #10 · answered by WC 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋