yes it can be used as an excuse for the defeat in world cup,but you need to put some hard ass logic.Lemme help you out,indians are good at it
Because of global warming the temperature in johannesburg was very high so the water got dried up, thus there was a water supply shortage in the hotel, so the australians couldt take bath and by the time the match started all of them were smelling like rotten spuds and they couldnt make any plan for the match as they couldnt stand each others body odour but indians are pretty used to water shortage thus they faced no such problem and won the match inspite of smelling each other's sweat
So its all because of global warming you see.Screw it
2007-10-15 21:46:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
What does Global Warming had to do for the defeat?? And Ind just won the T20 WC. Which country and which sport are you talking about?
Be it any sport, any country, how could you ever possibly link sports defeat with Global warming??? lol
2007-10-15 12:39:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Asif 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes.I think u have a valid point there.Global warming was the single most coz of the defeat in wc.Dont ask me how?
2007-10-15 13:20:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What global warning you are referring to. I have not heard about any global warning during cricket world cup.
2007-10-16 07:36:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well mate, it would be a pretty dumb excuse especially since Australia make no excuses for losing (unlike India unfortunately).
2007-10-16 03:48:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cricket hues 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Asif, he's talking about Australia. They blame everything- the wind, the ground, the opposition, the crowd, the weather, the country. But they never accept the fact that they "fcuked up"
2007-10-15 13:10:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by The ROCK 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
lol
What kind of an excuse is this?
2007-10-15 12:39:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Great Montitude 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
exactly~
australians are the cheaters in cricket...lol~
2007-10-15 22:25:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋