If one's foot strays into the next stall, is it cause for arrest?
2007-10-15 04:54:54 · 18 answers · asked by 2 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
When you're looking for gay sex in a airport mens room and offering to pay for it... yes.
2007-10-15 04:58:07 · answer #1 · answered by czekoskwigel 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Get all of the facts.
1. There is a "code" in that airport bathroom. It involves several steps IN ORDER. The cop witnessed the code being completed.
2. The "wide stance" you are referring to would take your feet being 5 feet apart in that restroom IF THE GUY NEXT TO YOU ALSO HAD A WIDE STANCE! So, in reality, you do not need a wide stance if a normal person is next to you...you have to be a contortionist.
3. Senator Craig has been accused of homosexual advances in the past more than once. (He can claim that he is not gay, because bi-sexuals do not refer to themselves as gay, and be legit) He cannot, however, even BEGIN to claim that he was not soliciting sex in a public place. That would be like claiming that someone accidently stumbled on a combination to a lock without trying.
marsha...ROFLMAO!!! Craig went to the stall next to an occupied stall. The cop was in the end stall, and there were 7 unoccupied stalls. Craig LOOKED BETWEEN THE DOOR AND FRAME! It is aparently part one of the homosexual "code" there. Then he proceeded to point by point follow the rest. Craig was NOT set up. Craig was exactly the gross person this sets him out to be (homosexual or not irrelevant...soliciting ANY sex in a public restroom is DISGUSTING!)
2007-10-15 05:01:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Even in the most narrow stalls, a foot straying has one meaning. If a foot strays to touch some elses in the next stall, that is a rather acrobatic p**p or pee.
Craig is a closet gay man. I don't personally care that he is , but that is rather indecent conduct for a leader. I don't think he should have resigned, but he said he would so now he should.
2007-10-15 05:00:13 · answer #3 · answered by rumbler_12 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah just don't looks over! But I don't think even that is an arrestable offense!
I stick to the one stall apart rule. Always leave a stall's gap between two men, some guys have no consideration about what direction their pee ends up in.
2007-10-15 04:59:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Senator Craig was set up! It amazes me that we go soooo far in America to validate homosexuality and then a cop "just happens" to stray into the stall next to Senator Craig and cause all this hullabaloo. I hope they think it's been worth causing an entire family to suffer through this stupidity.
2007-10-15 04:59:37 · answer #5 · answered by missingora 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Believe me! My feet will never be that wide. Never! I once went into a Public John and the man next to me was tapping like crazy. Then I discovered he was with the "River Dancers". No threat to me thank God!
2007-10-15 05:00:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you admit you were trying to solicit gay sex like that senator did. He signed a confession then a few days later tried to deny it, theyt tricked him by telling him if he confessed they wouldnt go public. A politician got burned the world is now a better place.
2007-10-15 05:01:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Its cause for concern.What are you looking for by doing that??It's not natural to spread your legs that far .Keep your feet in your own stall.
2007-10-15 05:09:36 · answer #8 · answered by hdf69 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it would depend if the guy next to you was an undercover cop, and if your foot was turned upwards.
2007-10-15 04:58:06 · answer #9 · answered by Robbie 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No playing footsies with the guy next door thank you very little
2007-10-15 04:58:40 · answer #10 · answered by mick987g 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if throwing spitballs. Be aware that the "clean socks" rule applies.
2007-10-15 04:59:03 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋