English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

links please and do not post any hillary clinton ones or bill clinton ones,,I would not believe anything they had to say,I would not accept a loaf of bread from them,WHERE ARE ALL THOSE WMDS IN IRAQ THAT BUSH TOOK ALL AMERICA TO WAR FOR????

2007-10-15 00:06:01 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I will ask this question untill a 100% verified true dangerius WMDS is proven to me,,,without saying BILL SAID OR HILLARY SAID,,,like I said,,I would not accept a loaf of bread from those mo---...chow good luck,,,I await your links ,,freepress

2007-10-15 00:23:30 · update #1

lady my question is specific im not interested in other stupid reasons ok,,,provide my link or accept that it was a false started war,,,,I dont want to hear about other reasons for THE WAR<<<

2007-10-15 00:26:02 · update #2

10 answers

OK, you asked the question. Don't berate the truthful answer if it doesn't suit you.

Keep this in mind..... EVERYONE believed Saddam had WMD's, Russia, France, Germany, Spain, UK, Italy.....EVERYONE. You know how first rate Russia's intelligence gathering is? They firmly believed it.

And guess what? They weren't wrong. Saddam moved them to Syria in a blundered move. He thought we wouldn't have the cojones to fight his elite troops for long.

Maybe the most telling evidence is the shock his generals displayed when they called for "special reinforcement". They expected the weapons, but nothing ever arrived. It was already buried in Syria.

I've directly answered the question you asked instead of silly posturing, so I will look for those 10 Points, thanks.

2007-10-15 00:23:20 · answer #1 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 2 0

Freepress02 - here's some loaf of bread for you, it was a bi-partisan decision that there were WMD's and to attack Iraq, people should give the blame to all whom supported the war. Both democrats and republicans, and stop this half truths of it was George Bush's war only for Iraqis oil. Where is the oil the democrats are accusing Bush of stealing at? And that type of WMD's information came from CIA and other US intelligence agencies. Which includes other countries and the UN who also made the same claims.. Where is your links that Saddam has never used any or are you depending on something from you-tube to satisfy your ego and sarcasm? Get it staright we are in a bi-partisan war and that is the full truth to it, no and's if or but's either. Have a great week bro!

2007-10-15 00:27:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually, Saddam lied approximately the WMD's. It used to be facet of his counter-intellegence application. He desired Iran to suppose he had WMD's so they would not invade considering that the UN made him vulnerable with all of the sanctions.

2016-09-05 09:56:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

WMDs were window dressing,this is a Hostile corporate takeover of the second biggest Oilfield in the world,we are in Afghanistan that's where the terrorists are on the border with Pakistan

2007-10-15 00:14:08 · answer #4 · answered by Will 5 · 0 2

The only thing missing from your re-hashed question was the re-hashed line - "weapons of mass deception".
Yawn.
Try to come up with something a little more original.

2007-10-15 00:29:53 · answer #5 · answered by Bumblebee711 5 · 0 0

I don't know. I am still waiting for those weapons that were supposidly in armed and aimed at America as Bush mentioned in his justification for war speech.

2007-10-15 01:27:58 · answer #6 · answered by White Star 4 · 1 1

Please read up on the 17 other valid reasons we went to war with Iraq.
Also, Bush does nothing on his own. Congress must approve.

2007-10-15 00:23:04 · answer #7 · answered by Mystine G 6 · 1 1

george bush did that? but he is such a good man, I do not believe you! (he he...) lol would not accept a loaf of bread from them! hahahahahahahahahahahaha! thats is SOOOOO funny! they're in the bottom left draw. wanna go get them out for me?

2007-10-15 00:11:04 · answer #8 · answered by awesomely_lame 3 · 0 3

Bush was ill informed by the intelligence community. And just so you don't remain ignorant Bush isn't the only one who believed there were WMD in Iraq. AND it wasn't just Republicans who believed there were WMD. As a matter of fact you would be hard pressed to find a leading Democrat who thought Saddam didn't have WMD BEFORE we went into Iraq. You want the list? Just E-mail me and I'll give you the quotes and the dates they were made. And many of them were before Bush even started running for President. Did Bush lie to Congress or did the Democrats convince him Saddam had WMD. After all Bill was so smart and he believed Saddam had WMD. Bush believed Saddam must have had WMD because Bill believed Saddam had WMD.

You wanted to know who believe Saddam had WMD besides Bill and Hillary and you probably don't allow E-mail So I'll give then to you here.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.


AND it wasn't just the US that thought he had them. Name a major country that didn't. Russia, Britain, France, Germany Japan, China, and the list goes on, all believed Saddam had WMD in mass quantities.

When you stop and think about it why would Saddam not let the inspectors in if he didn't think he had WMD. If the truth were known I think he wanted WMD so bad he demanded the scientists produce them or be terminated with extreme prejudice. The scientists couldn't produce them but lied to Saddam to save their rears. By the time Saddam found out they had lied to him it was all over.

NO WMD but until the US went in there was no way of knowing.

2007-10-15 02:43:55 · answer #9 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0 1

the answer,my friend,is blowing in the wind,the answer is blowing in the wind.

ain't no links. ain't no WMD.

Why are we still in Iraq????????

2007-10-15 00:19:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers