AA
let us see
1 algerian case
muslims won elections,only one day later the elections were cancelled and the terror started,i would not say muslim terror,i think its more complicated than saying that,it is the case of war lords and generals who mostly live in france
2 palestinian case
7amas won the elections ,but since all the region tried the best they can to make it fall in less than 3 months,even all arab countries took part in that,money sanctions,political sanctions,.....
even the internal factor did not help them,such as whenever the minister of interior affairs wanted some police attendance they did not back him ,and they considered his presence as nill
TV,was only broadcasting fat7 but not the other party and so on,in the minute gaza was took over by 7amas with its own power there was a new appointed government ,and money was again to that new government
3 the syrian case
not many were against the inheritage of assad from his father,
4 the iraqi case
i doubt if that is yet solved but i said in more than one occasion that we never had a better world with this new democracy in baghdad ,as they called saddam ruled with dictatoship ,but i suppose even though the world and iraq was much safer,but the west do not want this region to have two major powers it ought to be only israel3 .
5 to your case
a the egyptians show very little care and interest
in politics
b Egypt is a major element in the area,and all
parties has the fear of a national"qawmi"
role of egypt,so to them egypt must stay
tied up with treaties and fund stop fear
c intellectuals role in egypt is very narrow and
inaffective.
d keeping the majority of population under the
poverty standerd would keep that great leyer
pple only care for the daily food
e widening and enlarging this layer is essential
for having things under control with no real
mutual interest between the narow middle class and intelectual as on side and the wide poor population on the other side
f comes now your question ,where that leeds
Egypt,it wont be necessity to mubarak family,
but by necessity it should be mubarak line
WAKI
there is no such thing as you said
"give egyptians their freedom" you just say"give iraqies their freedom" "give palestyinians their freedom" sudan,pakistan,sumal,
freedom never is given
Ibrahim Tuqan Palesyinian says
" wa lel 7urreyyati el 7amraa2i babon
be kulli yaden muddarajaten yu daqqu"
2007-10-15 01:12:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Neither of them.
Gamal is like king Farouk and he can't be responsible even for a small governrate .. may be they can let him be the Governor of Menya. He is just a well educated person, that's not enough to be even a minister.
Muslims brothers : Few of them are cultured and religious people, but most of them are low level people who has or had problems with the governments along the history. Same elements who made the terrorism groups and attacked civilians in the name of religion. I'm against any use of the name Islam in such a game.
I will be against both now and later. Both of them may live on our died bodies. Gamal with ignorance and Muslim brothers with good knowledge and experience in Politics game.
2007-10-15 06:32:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wise Heart 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
If Gamal Mubarak takes control, Deterioration will continue.
If Muslim brotherhood take control, God knows what is going to happen next.
I would go for any body who work for Egypt, not for a punch of friends.
2007-10-14 23:39:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Salloo7a 3
·
6⤊
0⤋
Basicly there is very little difference between them . The Muslim Brotherhood will take Egypt back to the stone age. Gamal Mubarak is half way there.
2007-10-15 00:18:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
If the choice is only between those two i will choose Gamal. Why, first coz he will be nominated anyway and secondly and most important i feel he might be different from his father at least he would be doing everything in his power to show that he is better. (wishfull thinking isn't it?)
Anyway, the main reason why i didn't choose muslim brotherhood is coz they r not organzied and they have a lot of problems amongst them, and quite franckly Egypt can't take anymre chaos.
2007-10-15 00:12:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hope 6
·
7⤊
2⤋
There is a saying "if only the people of Egypt had all thrown a stone at Firon at the same time, there would have been nothing he could do" my point is until the people of Egypt stand up for themselves once and for all, nothing but the name of who's in charge will change.....like the MB or not, at least they are trying...and I dont see Gamal out feeding the poor, operating charity hospitals, etc etc. In fact i dont see near enough of that at all in Egypt Except for Very religious people....those of u who want the dunya, u can have it....Ill take the Jennah ISA....
2007-10-15 09:51:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Adam 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
أنتِ وضعتيني أمام خيارين , أحلاهما مر
بالعامي ما أسخن من ستي إلا سيدي
but i will choose Gamal , as i don't want to wear the burka on my face stay at home to be the fourth wife to man who considers all the society an infidel!
besides hiding under the religion desguise to reach the power is very destructive and from the aspects of hypocrisy!
and no i will never allow this to happen in Egypt !
I will do my best to prevent them from taking the upper hand!
2007-10-15 05:48:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♥ 3
·
5⤊
2⤋
The area of the persons for the sake of democracy. the main threat in this revolution is that we don't be attentive to who might take over in Egypt after an election. often, the intense events are plenty greater effective prepared than the different events that are greater reflective of the inhabitants (Hammas in Lebanon). consequently, I chosen the area of the persons for their sake, and the sake of democracy (and liberty and freedom). yet i'm hoping that the Brotherhood isn't the only properly prepared oposition.
2016-10-20 07:38:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gamal mobarek ....ofcourse gamal mobarek....i dont want to wake up to find my self in my house and no way out
2007-10-15 04:34:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
gamal , not an officer , not extremist . he is the best bad option around , but if there is any hint of a third option I'll choose it , just no more military freaks .
2007-10-15 00:37:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by hasafer 7
·
7⤊
1⤋