I want your opinions, NOT the format and what others think.
Whether they are good...which is the best form...etc etc...
2007-10-14 22:02:03 · 14 answers · asked by Sal 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
ODI IS BEST FOR ME
but 20-20 is a great fun/thriller
2007-10-15 04:34:11 · answer #1 · answered by Neil 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm still a fan of test cricket. Watching some of the great innings by guys like Taylor, Ganguly/Laxman, Richards (both), Steve Waugh's farewell 100 at the SCG and watching Allan Border dig in for a day against the wild old West Indies attacks was far better than any 50 over ODI. I like ODI as light relief - Gilchrist, Jayasuriya, Viv Richards make a trip to the game worth while.
T20 hasn't really taken off here in Australia. So I've hardly seen any. I don't know that it will.
2007-10-14 22:34:26 · answer #2 · answered by Quandary 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
20-20:
Brings out the best in a player. Why? Bastman has a very short time to settle down. out of form? then warm the seat in pavilion. Batman with good eye and timing tend to shine. Power helps for hitting those 6s.
Bowlers have extra pressure. Need to bowl accurately, no scope for error in line and length. Containing runs is a big priority, while taking wickets too. Murderous for bowlers.
I like One days too, but feels a bit long after that 20-20 storm. We do need the tests because thats where players can polish their skills.
2007-10-14 23:14:14 · answer #3 · answered by rendezvous_rama 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think test cricket is a good format as it helps us in improving our batting techniques and ODI is decnt format and T-20 is the wost format of Cricket in this planet.
2007-10-14 22:07:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Test Cricket
It helps a player to improve his skills more to play any format of the game in cricket.
2007-10-14 22:12:00 · answer #5 · answered by Nafeez Nash 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Test Cricket is a snorefest...boring and ends up in a draw
ODI is the most excitng form of cricket and should be played more.
T-20....undecided yet - its great to watch but I cant take it seriously.
2007-10-14 22:28:49 · answer #6 · answered by PLANET ROGUE-POP: 1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
20/20 will take over everything in the game sooner than we think! England and Australia are the only countries who get any value from TEST 'S...which women find boring , taking too long for a result . 20/20 suits women,.. "Happening Action".. ..and I think thats how cricket is going to evolve in the future ...wait and see!
2007-10-15 00:17:58 · answer #7 · answered by deedubya 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
test maches are not so very intresting because bats do not play their strokes and mostly the result is a draw
ODIs are in between test and t20
T20 is better than test and odi because the batsmen always hit their strokes
2007-10-18 22:10:28 · answer #8 · answered by Deoxys 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
test cricket is da best form of cricket..it tests teams all round skills...while odis and T20 test players batting skills and agility of dere bodies...da latter is for jus young guns...and da former...can be played very eaily by crciketers till da age of 38 if dey r physically fit...while da test cricket can b played till ne age..till da time ur performing...n enjoy it..
2007-10-14 22:22:55 · answer #9 · answered by Gutsy Indian! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Presently T20 has become most popular as it is exciting and entertaining and there will be no dull moment throughout the match, though there may be many flaws technically.
2007-10-15 00:48:29 · answer #10 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋