Was Shreesant responsible for India's loss against Australia?

Question

In the nagpur ODI of India vs. Australia, Shreesanth conceded 64 runs in 8 overs. Conceding 8 runs an over is too costly in one day cricket. India lost by 18 runs, but if Shreesanth was even to concede just around 6 runs an over, India could have won. Actually even 6 runs per over for bowler is expensive in ODI but Shreesanth is going even beyond 7.5 to 8 runs an over. What is wrong with shreesanth's bowling? What is your opinion on, if shreesanth was responsible for the loss? He has proven to be an expensive bowler throughout the series.

Answer 1

Yes he is one of the eleven people responsible for Indias loss.Maybe he should be dropped from the team for ever.

Answer 2

Its shreesanth partly, and why hasnt he been asked to stop those runs? What is Dhoni doing, what is coach doing, what is the team doing?

You cant beat an Aussie batsman with pace, with such erratic lines and lengths. He gets clobbered. Shreesanth cant do 150, and even if he did, he is not in control !! Right now when he gets pumped up, he is just bowling for pace.

Answer 3

Going by utilising Dhoni's statements,Sachin is to blame.He reported that they have got been some runs short.Its unlike he has reported this basically via fact India lost,he had already made this sparkling while he reported after win over Lanka that no finished may well be straightforward to shield.while it relatively is the case,runs on the board is maximum mandatory.that's no longer the 1st time that we've observed that Indian bowling is undesirable,we've widespread it via fact that time immemorial.So once you play,you have been attentive to your team strengths and weaknesses and confirmed greater advantageous urgency in scoring.Its rather sparkling that it became right into a egocentric innings.What else are you able to assert while gave a maiden over in between the skill performs?

Answer 4

Lot of things went wrong for India in the Nagpur match. Dravid missed 2 catches. Though one catch was difficult, in normal course he would have easily taken the same. Sreesanth dropped Symonds, when he was on 2. Yuvaraj conceded 15 runs in one over. All these cost the match to india, which they would have won.

Answer 5

yes

he gave up 26 runs in his first 3 overs

he also dropped Andrew Symonds when symonds was on 5.

India had all the momentum in the world as they removed Ponting, Hodge and GIlchrist within a 5 over period when sreesanth dropped symonds

symonds went on to make a century and push the Australian score beyond 315 and India didn't recover from that mess


CAN WE ALL FINALY AGREE THAT INDIA WILL NEVER EVER BEAT AUSTRALIA OR SOUTH AFRICA OR SRI LANKA CHASING 260+ runs!!!!

Answer 6

Yes, he & few other bowlers shared with Sreesanth too.

Sreesanth is Aussies favourite bowler.

This is just the beginning for him, he will find it even worse when he goes to Australia to play the next series.

He burnt the logs which were wet, now it's burning his own roof, it's also gonna be tough for the other teams to win against them now.

Answer 7

yes ofcorse and i have a good suggession:
If am the manager of the team (coach) i will make my boys to follow any of the thumb rules(???) as below!

For batting
1.
Top order 4 batsmen must score 200 runs together (avg 50 runs) in 30 overs, middle 4 must score 100 runs (avg 25) together in next 16 overs and the last 3 must score 30 runs together (avg 10) in the last 4 overs = total 330 min

or
2.
First 25 overs = 160 runs (they cud lose 4 wickets), next 15 overs 105 runs (cud lose next 3 wkts), next 10 overs 35 runs (they cud lose all) = 300 + minimum

or
3.
put the 4 tail enders to bat first and instruct them to score a minimum of 20 runs each in 12 or lesser ball = 80 runs in 8 overs, the middle order 4 should score 30 runs min in 24 balls = 120 runs in 16 overs, and the top order two must score comfortably in the next 26 overs as their wish in test syle and to score 100 runs min = 300 +

and bowling:

no bowler shud make any wide, noone shud give more than 5 runs per over.....

sure nobody cud beat us ........almost we will be the winner....

tell them to try this.................

Answer 8

So just because the batsmen didn't perform despite the platform provided by Dada & Sachin, Sreesanth is responsible?

Wow. I commend your brain for this idiotic thinking !

Answer 9

YES. and i am happy that India Lost From Australia

Answer 10

He never seems to learn.He is there only because he is the lone right arm bowler among other left arm fast bowlers.Let him discipline himself instead of firing up others.