English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

Have you visited Los Angeles these days? It pretty much looks like Mexico except carefully selected spots

With Hillary America would turn into Los Angeles much sooner than anyone else. We want to save America, we want to vote for someone who will stop this invasion, like Tancredo

2007-10-14 17:44:21 · answer #1 · answered by ed s 3 · 4 1

No! Shes a puppet of the CFR agenda which is guided by the likes of the Trilateral Commission & the Bilderberg group, run by evil people like David Rockefeller and other soulless bankers. Cheney loves the CFR too... go figure.. ;) If you vote for those puppets you'll see more of the same and WORSE!

I think Ron Paul would be a FAR better president, for all of our sakes.

2007-10-15 00:44:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

No she doesn't know her economics,she wants to give a 5000 debit card to every kid born in the U.S.Not knowing that this will only encourage people especially illegals to have children.And would cause overpopulation and poverty.
She supports the dream act,she believes the U.S should police the world,she wants to tax oil companies,wich would raise gas prices.She also loves taxing big companies and small businisses, not knowing that by taxing these companies they just move overseas and jobs here are lost.all the democrats in this election are anti-american.Republican Ron Paul looks to be the best candidate.

2007-10-15 00:41:41 · answer #3 · answered by Zaneli 3 · 5 1

As far as I know she's pro-nuclear-war, which should be a serious enough issue to make you NOT want to vote for her. Not to mention, Bill Clinton served 8 years in the White House?

There is a reason that they have 4 year presidential terms, with a maximum of 10 years in office if the circumstances are right. Look what happened when Bush Jr. became white house, it's been downhill since! The last thing we need is another family in the White House that knows exactly how to use it to their advantage.

I suggest voting for Ron Paul. He wants to move out of the "war on terror" (aka a never-ending fantasy war). His idea is because we just jumped right into it, we can jump right out of it, honestly what is so complicated about leaving the middle-east? OH YA, BECAUSE BUSH DOESN'T WANT TO HAVE TO MAKE A PUBLIC SPEECH SAYING: ".............Oops... This was kind of pointless".

Ron Paul wants to get rid of the IRS, the income tax, reduce government taxing, and reduce government spending! Immediately with the IRS and income tax being abolished we the people will be taking in more money (which belongs to us!).

Did you know Bush has spent trillions on military funding OVERSEAS? YET, here in our own country, we have financial problems, poor education-funding, and poor medical-funding.

Ron Paul is extremely easy to understand, he doesn't use White House / Political slang to confuse you into voting for them. When he speaks, you can understand exactly what he is saying in real time, and he speaks the truth.

To vote for Ron Paul in the primary you need to be a declared Republican so be sure to do that before your state's deadline!!!

VOTE RON PAUL! USA's LAST CHANCE!

2007-10-15 00:36:14 · answer #4 · answered by superbaler 2 · 5 2

Hilary can fake it just as well as the other presidents. Including Roosevelt, none of the previous presidents ever did anything noteworthy except Kennedy's handling of the Cuban Crisis which almost ended in a nuclear holocaust,.

2007-10-15 00:36:14 · answer #5 · answered by Don S 5 · 5 2

She would not make a good president! The one person who had evidence against her and Bill supposedly committed suicide. Yeah right! With a .22 caliber gun in his hand and a .38 caliber slug in his head? Suicide! Really? I wish I could remember his name. Some one here might remember. It was all over the news!

2007-10-15 00:39:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

No. She's too ambitious. She's on an ego trip. I'd be very skeptical of someone who wants to be president as bad as she does.

2007-10-15 00:51:05 · answer #7 · answered by TedEx 7 · 4 1

Hell No
Hildebeast is a socialist which is a closet communist.
This is a Capitalist country.

2007-10-15 01:02:37 · answer #8 · answered by CFB 5 · 2 1

I think she would.


Right now, she is the only candidate from either parties that actually has a plan (or ideas). We need someone who is going to be prepared for the job. Remember; being President is always hard, but it's going to be a lot harder, because you're going to have to deal with the mistakes that Bush has left.

Not only that, but I'm ready for a woman President. Men have ran this country for the past 200 plus years. It's about time we have a woman in office to show all those greedy bastards what they're doing wrong.



I'm also a big Clinton supporter. I loved Bill. I love Hillary. I'm ready for another Clinton Era. The first one wasn't half bad.

2007-10-15 00:25:15 · answer #9 · answered by Jeremiah 5 · 3 9

Good for nothing, I'd say. She and Bill have an agenda to make themselves richer and richer, while you and I get poorer and poorer, assuming that you are a hard working American as I am. Can you name one good thing she has done to date? How about Bill? Heaven help us if she's the nominee.

2007-10-15 00:30:16 · answer #10 · answered by Kevin U 4 · 7 3

fedest.com, questions and answers