English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Moss was a gamble, but there is no doubt that the Pats are MUCH better with him and Brady is all of a sudden a MUCH better QB also.

If Moss was on the Colts instead, would the Pats be anything special this year?

2007-10-14 16:38:17 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football (American)

7 answers

they are special with or without him...

2007-10-14 16:48:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anna 4 · 0 0

Marvin Harrison, Reggi Wayne, Moss, Dallas Clark, Addai? Man, Fantasy Team Already!

2007-10-14 23:44:13 · answer #2 · answered by lilewu 4 · 0 0

Eagles made it to 3 playoffs without T.O.

T.O. comes along, they lose to superbowl "TO couldnt carry this team"

no, you are as bad as the announcers. The pats are no better with Moss then they were without him. The Cowboys are no better with TO (Or the eagles, or the 49rs were) then without him.

and SINCE WHEN HAS BRADY NOT BEEN A GOOD QB?? the guy gets double covered sometimes, its no more a difference then defense reading run, and you passing it. one person does not make a team, and 1 receiver does not make a QB. 1 QB goes nowhere without an offensive line.

its a dang team sport.

2007-10-15 04:00:51 · answer #3 · answered by drew c 2 · 0 0

Woulda, shoulda, coulda...Uh, the Pats won 3 Super Bowls without Moss...

2007-10-14 23:42:09 · answer #4 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 0 0

The Pats would still beat them. Moss and Peyton wouldn't get along at all.

2007-10-14 23:55:18 · answer #5 · answered by Steven R 6 · 0 0

DAmn that would be a scary offense manning, harrison, wayne ,moss,clark, addai but the pats will stil be a good team good enough to still win

2007-10-15 01:19:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if the queen had baaallls she would be king.
if if if if. go what's real

2007-10-14 23:43:45 · answer #7 · answered by MR TADS 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers