English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

I know that it bothers me that Sandy Burgler is on her staff. But that is what the Clintons do. The pay you to violate the law and lie for them by giving you a job, or helping you flee the country, or selling you a pardon for 1 million dollars. However, it does not suprise me that one half of the most dishonest couple in America would reward a person that stole classified documents from the National Archives to protect them.

2007-10-14 16:23:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Hillary does not have Sandy Berger as our security adviser and can't appoint anybody as "our" anything until she is elected.

2007-10-14 16:18:26 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. WD 5 · 3 0

Apparently Berger is affiliated somehow with Hillary's campaign, and you are not alone in being troubled by this. However you won't her much about this from the allegedly non liberally biased media. Proving that they aren't so unbiased of course.

2007-10-14 16:36:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

You know, I don't feel good about a guy who destroys 3 documents relating to 9/11.

Bush, on the other hand, has convicted felons from the Reagan area conducting foreign policy. Yep, let's trade weapons with Hussein so the Republicans can maintain office! Who was whispering in the Israelis ears last year? Nicaraguan felons run our foreign policy and Cuba. Yep, glad the CIA trains people to kill nuns and priests. It's a short jump to kill outspoken Americans!

2007-10-14 16:44:30 · answer #4 · answered by muppetkiller_2000 5 · 1 2

Honestly I have trouble with the whole Hillary thing to start!!

Bad enough she is a Senator... we do NOT need her as a President.

2007-10-14 16:22:49 · answer #5 · answered by Lady Harley99 4 · 2 2

yeah, never mind about the bush complicity with the saudi arabians for his entire presidency.

lets focus on some person who might be appointed to something if and if and if...

folks, the words that describe this sort of whining are:
impotent
powerless
republican.

2007-10-14 17:04:39 · answer #6 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0 2

Who says Hillary will have anything to do with it...
we've not been so stupid as making her president
yet!!?

2007-10-14 16:17:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Yes...Michael Dutton Douglas is not available

2007-10-14 16:17:27 · answer #8 · answered by naterino 3 · 0 1

no you are not the only one,.....he is corrupt, as she is,.....nice question you have asked,.....e-mail me anytime,.....though you know he, Berger is just working on her campaign,.....

2007-10-14 18:22:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If she ever did get elected (God forbid) putting the "BURGLAR" in charge of security would truly be letting the fox guard the hen house

2007-10-14 16:28:25 · answer #10 · answered by CFB 5 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers