Why then, do they accuse everyone who dislikes Bush of hating America?
Especially when Bush has worked so hard at being disliked with his horrendous policies.
2007-10-14 16:05:13 · 14 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush is a sitting wartime president. Clinton is a former president still behaving badly. You could insult Bush with your mantra, but if you had the facts, you wouldn't sound so ignorant.
2007-10-14 16:37:36 · answer #1 · answered by su·i ge·ne·ris 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
No, they were cheered on by many, but not all Republicans.
The accusations are retaliation by The NC-PNAC media arm for questioning unsound policies.
The reason the PNAC failed in their efforts to remove Clinton from office is that the Senate was not so easily bullied as the House. The Senate, consisting of more true conservatives, knew that Clinton shared many of their views and opinions. He had shown a willingness to compromise and endorse their agendas. Al Gore was basically an unknown to them.
Clinton's willingness to work with others did not extend to the Neocon PNAC. We can see by the horrendous policy decisions made by President Bush, that Clinton was correct in only paying them lip service.
2007-10-14 16:27:16 · answer #2 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
it really is an extremely strong factor. yet I nonetheless like Rush and loved his instruct. He become very exciting and on the air on the right time to make distinctive funds stating the Clintons schemes. The Clintons are scam artists. it would want to be exciting to verify Rush as ruthless on George W. regardless of the truth that.
2016-10-21 04:29:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows what strange game those neocons were playing with Clinton. I refuse to get caught up with it, because in the end...the man came out smelling like a rose...served 2 terms, wifey got to be senator for NY when she's not even from NY, and now gets to flirt with the idea of being the first female president of the united states (don't think she'll win, but she's making a hell of alot of money in campaign contributions)...it may have looked like Clinton was being bamboozled and assaulted to the average onlooker, but behind the scenes, i think something completely different was definitely afoot.
2007-10-14 16:11:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Not that Clinton was the best president, but Verbal assault?
They tried to make people believe he was a mass murderer, a drug runner and raped 4 women
UnAmerican and this kind of conservatism are SYNONYMOUS
I don't mind REAL conservatives, but people like this would sell this country for ONE MORE DOLLAR in the pockets without blinking.
The same goes for extremist liberals
RADICAL CENTER!
2007-10-14 16:44:40 · answer #5 · answered by captain_koyk 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, in Limbaugh's opinion, Clinton screwed America with his his horrendous policies.
Both sides always do the same thing. In the end, the Democrats and Republicans are equally corrupt, and aren't protecting the people's interests.
2007-10-14 16:09:30 · answer #6 · answered by CowJudgesYou 5 · 7⤊ 2⤋
it is ok to attack policies, like what limbaugh does to clinton. but liberals are hitting below the belt by attacking bush as a person.
2007-10-14 21:08:58 · answer #7 · answered by Ted M 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They certainly were not. It only became un-American to criticize the president after 9/11. After all, "9/11 changed everything." I'm sure that if a Democrat is elected in 2008, it will be okay to criticize the president and everything s/he does once again.
Someone once suggested that conservatives love their country the way a four-year-old loves his mommy. If you criticize his mom, you are a bad person who hates his mommy. Liberals, on the other hand, love their country the way an adult loves his mom. Okay, she drives him nuts sometimes, and there are things he would like to change about her, but she's mostly good, and he doesn't fear honest criticism of his mom--or his country.
2007-10-14 16:17:09 · answer #8 · answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Clinton isn't president. It isn't bashing Bush that your neocons are saying is antiAmerican, it's when they put down a president, any president during war time and to the point of going to our enemies and denouncing him and the country publically that makes those doing it antiAmerican. How can you not see this?
2007-10-14 16:35:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
We don't. What we don't like is the fact that some of those haters of Bush say he is a murderer and that he did the war only for political gains. Their is no factual basis for those opinions. It is something to disagree with the president, but another to say he started a war and has killed thousands just for his own good with no proof.
2007-10-14 16:09:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋