of course the climate's changing, it goes in cycles. if you look back on records from a hundred years ago, the climate was more similar to today's than fifty years ago. global warming is being exaggerated to make money, especially in book sales by a certain ex-vp. it gives the presidential candidates another pointless topic to argue over while real problems could be solved.
2007-10-14 15:27:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rachel 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm sure there are -- but as with most such debates, the two sides are really arguing entirely unrelated issues.
General scientific consensus is that something is causing a global climate shift -- how much of one, how quickly, and how badly are still being worked out.
And nobody (rationally) can deny that man has something to do with it -- dumping billions of tons of toxins into the atmosphere and cutting down millions of square miles of forest has to have SOME effect -- so the only question is, how much is mankind's contribution, and how much is a naturally occurring phenomenon.
But people seem more concerned with arguing about the definitions than actually trying to find solutions -- which, sadly, is also common.
2007-10-14 15:17:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
There is no such thing as man made climate change.
If so, how did man get to Mars or the other planets which are also undergoing climate change.
Sigh.....
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2006/11nov/solarsystemwarming.html
2007-10-14 15:11:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
You are correct, the debate is about whether man is or is not the contributing factor.
A person cannot dispute the valid scientific evidence that indicates a 0.7 degree rise in temperature - one can, however, dispute the cause.
2007-10-14 15:10:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Climate change is going on but the debate is it man made or not.
I happen to think an ex-vicepresident making money off it should be consider an expert.
2007-10-14 15:07:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Nobody denying climate change.
We just denying that it is all man-made.
Do we know what temperature was 100,000 years ago without private jets and carbon footprint?
2007-10-14 15:37:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Obama Happends 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, some people here in central Kansas still deny that the climate is changing. Same folks also deny evolution.
2007-10-14 15:06:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by sudonym x 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
DID ANYONE TALK TO THE MOON AND THE SUN ABOUT THIS. DON'T FORGET ABOUT 12-21-2012 MAYBE MR AL CAN STOP THAT DAY FROM COMING.
2007-10-14 23:45:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by jerry z 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nobody denies it! What people argue is why it has changed.
2007-10-14 15:51:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Flyer 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I notice you don't call it Global Warming anymore.
That's cus you cant decide which way the thermometer is going, you just want to blame Bush.
2007-10-14 15:17:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋