The enlightening physical and mental experience of swimming through the tunnel could not have been achieved without a certain amount of doggedness and a clear commitment to accomplishing the act.
2007-10-14 14:51:40 · 30 answers · asked by H.U. Soldier 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
It doesn't have to make sense; you do not have to understand what it is about
I just want to know if it is grammatically correct
Thank you =]
2007-10-14 14:58:15 · update #1
the sentence itself is grammatically correct; however, you may want to edit. it borders on being a run-on sentence. a suggestion (take it or leave it, my feelings will not be hurt): instead of one long sentence you may want to create two smaller sentences.
"The physical and mental experience of swimming through the tunnel could be best described as enlightening. Such a feat could not have been acheived without a certain level of doggedness as well as a clear commitment to the intended goal."
good luck!
2007-10-14 15:02:39 · answer #1 · answered by Reni Valentine 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is grammatically correct but far too long you should split into two sentences.
Swimming through the tunnel could not have been achieved without a certain amount of doggedness and a clear commitment to accomplishing the act. The experience provided both physical and mental enlightenment.
(i would replace clear commitment to unwavering commitment. I would also change mental to intellectual)
2007-10-14 15:02:11 · answer #2 · answered by Bishop 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the enlightening physical and mental xp of swimming through the tunnel could not have been achieved w/out a certain amount of doggedness and a clear commitment 2 accomplishing the act
There you go, I fixed it.
hehe :]
2007-10-14 14:54:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Preserve it simple and boil it down. Use the past easy as a substitute of a best hectic and ditch the preposition on the end of the sentence. Your sentence is not flawed, but it would be increased. I forgot to place in all of the polite stuff that by and large begins or ends an e mail. I forgot to use all of the polite stuff that mostly starts or ends an electronic mail. I forgot to use the polite stuff that quite often starts offevolved or ends an email.
2016-08-05 21:13:06 · answer #4 · answered by pounds 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is grammatically correct as far as I can tell but it seems excessively wordy and awkward. Why would swimming through a tunnel be "enlightening" both physically and mentally. How does one become enlightened physically?
2007-10-14 14:55:32 · answer #5 · answered by Ben H 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2007-10-14 14:53:55 · answer #6 · answered by Evan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
shop it straight forward and boil it down. Use the previous straight forward as a replace of a appropriate annoying and ditch the preposition on the top of the sentence. Your sentence isn't incorrect, even though it would desire to be more advantageous. I forgot to put in each and all the well mannered stuff that in many cases starts off or ends an digital mail. I forgot to apply each and all the well mannered stuff that in many cases starts off or ends an digital mail. I forgot to apply the well mannered stuff that in many cases starts off or ends an digital mail.
2016-10-09 06:01:09 · answer #7 · answered by buswell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, the sentence is fine. It's a long sentence, but it is grammatically correct.
2007-10-14 14:56:02 · answer #8 · answered by Steve-Fu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but it's awkward and wordy. It contains too many abstractions and it's written in the passive voice.
2007-10-14 14:56:01 · answer #9 · answered by Angelique 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it does, but it's really long, so the reader may have to read it a couple of times to fully understand the meaning. it would be better if you split it up into a couple of sentences
2007-10-14 14:55:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋