2007-10-14 14:46:56 · 7 answers · asked by N.C.O 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
No he wasn't, because:
1. At least one person would have come forward
2. No motive that even remotely makes sense
3. Scientists have completely rejected all the conspiracy theory mumbo-jumbo
4. Al-qaeda is self-admitted perpertrator with motive and history of attacks
2007-10-18 14:11:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Old & tired issue -
OBL & his gang of terrorists were behind the attacks. Time to move on people.....
2007-10-14 22:02:47 · answer #2 · answered by anna s 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, he wasn't but the second gunman on the grassy knoll was.
2007-10-14 22:21:02 · answer #3 · answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not exactly. The people above him were. Research Operation Northwoods.
2007-10-14 21:57:52 · answer #4 · answered by zombi86 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
He doesn't speak Arabic and why is moot.
2007-10-15 01:32:01 · answer #5 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no he wasnt and there is no way he could have kept it from happening
2007-10-14 23:25:38 · answer #6 · answered by axen2143 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No he was not, end of story, theory, and imagination.
2007-10-14 23:23:41 · answer #7 · answered by bgee2001ca 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋