Come on emily beat her.
2007-10-14 12:52:26 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
I'm fine with her being #1. She's very intelligent, and deserves her current status. But thanks for the encouragement. You're too sweet.
WTF why 3 thumbs down!!!!
2007-10-14 13:04:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
properly i do not inevitably believe the CDC anymore than i trust different agencies at the same time as it is composed of "info" and rather info. the in basic terms massive difference with the CDC and the different communities is they could get the protection pressure and regulation to back them up at the same time as it is composed of ailment and extreme outbreaks. So with that expertise, I understand they are effectual and doubtless have the most precise stats. I do imagine date rape is on the upward push and many of the circumstances likely do not get suggested in any respect. If something, the CDC's stats are likely below what's extremely occurring.
2016-10-21 04:17:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rio is incorrect when she says my account was suspended. My account has never been suspended and I actually have more correct answers than her. I sign in under Yahoo Canada and that is where I am listed as top contributer. I have no idea where she would get her information from but I assure you that it is wrong.
2007-10-14 14:23:22 · answer #3 · answered by Deirdre O 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
It's only been a few months now. Croa was my predecessor, but sadly, she left GWS for greener pastures. Deirdre O came before her, but that account was suspended. Once another woman here achieves a number of BAs that surpasses mine, I will happily concede victory to her. Emily L would certainly deserve it, among many others. Until then, how's the weather down there?
EDIT: I do ask questions sometimes, but most of the time, they belong in other forums.
EDIT TO STOCKMAN: So the jig is up. Damn.
EDIT TO DEIRDRE O: I checked out Y! Canada. You do have more BAs there than the site says I do at the moment, but most of that list is compiled of answerers with amounts in the double digits. We've far execeeded those numbers now. I can't say why you aren't on the current US list, but the Canada list seems out-of-date.
2007-10-14 13:04:30 · answer #4 · answered by Rio Madeira 7 · 2⤊ 6⤋
This is not a competition.
Rio answers well.
The title of top contributor does not bother her.
How little you understand this forum.
How little you understand Canadian women!
2007-10-14 17:44:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Does one get Neiman-Marcus dollars if you are number one??? No?? Then who cares. It is not a career it is not a relationship it is not important.
2007-10-14 15:27:34 · answer #6 · answered by The Ms. 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
She's simply one of the best. It's not about beating her, it's about being proud of seeing an intelligent woman taking the lead. I love the fact that her ideology doesn't conflict with her actions, so I'll gladly keep her on the top.
2007-10-14 12:57:41 · answer #7 · answered by Lioness 6 · 8⤊ 5⤋
Why can't any of the trolls make no. 1 in GWS?
2007-10-14 14:59:23 · answer #8 · answered by Theodore H 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I didn't think anyone payed attention to this... Why would you care one way or another?
2007-10-14 17:12:29 · answer #9 · answered by ms.sophisticate 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Maybe we don't want to beat her... has it ever occurred to you that we may not be as competitive as men? ....and we don't get into "my dong is bigger than your dong" contests...
2007-10-14 15:10:22 · answer #10 · answered by Fex 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋