Only sons could be heirs to the thrown. Without a son, his line of ancestory would end.
2007-10-14 10:12:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Truth is elusive 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because boys can carry on the last name keeping the royalty in the family by taking over the throne. A girl would have to marry outside the family causing the guys she chooses to marry family to take over Henrys throne and he didnt want that!!
2007-10-14 17:16:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Courtney 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
To succeed him to the throne. He DID have a son - Edward - who, under the Act of Succession of 1543, inherited the Crown, becoming Edward VI.
2007-10-14 17:16:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
To succeed him to the throne & also so that his name did not die out. He didn't want any husband of his daughter inheriting all his riches & power.
2007-10-14 17:25:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nelly 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
he didnt want a daughter to take over the throne
2007-10-14 17:11:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Probably to succeed him on the throne.
2007-10-14 17:13:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
he wanted his child to be a successor, and women couldn't be king at that point
2007-10-14 17:17:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by reading writing loving 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
because he wanted his son to have and run england, everything that he helped build.
2007-10-14 17:17:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
people always want what they don't have. In this case he was probably looking for an hier.
2007-10-14 17:13:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by jennifer 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Cause he likes men?
2007-10-14 17:18:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
2⤋