Hi Julia. I'm with you. I think the Blairs know more than they are letting on, don't you? It's also why TB left office so quickly and gave his job to well known Mccann friend Gordon Brown without a fight. That's why Clarence Mitchell is there - to keep it all hushed up. And the Pope is definitely involved in this as well - you can't tell me that Tony Blair's audience with the Pope and the Mccanns visit to the Vatican is unconnected. It will all come out soon - don't worry. Keep up the good work and ignore the critics on here who just dont want to hear the truth.
2007-10-14 07:13:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
that is been an prolonged time for the reason that every physique asked a real looking or new question. They get repeated advert nauseam. and of course that's the comparable human beings asking the comparable question, just to be provocative. you ought to of course commence listening to human beings's solutions, as a replace of in simple terms rejecting them out of hand through fact they don't extra healthful your stance. yet that would contain having an open thoughts.
2016-10-22 09:35:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi Julie, you ok?
Its Yoda on his soap box.
You have a right to ask a question and to your opinion, but you will find that some on here only think they have a right to ask and give there opinions that you must believe.
You ask whatever you want, they the up their own butts take the time to answer it does what you intended to cause a debate.
Well done 10 points from me..
you will offend people by not being a McCann PRO
2007-10-14 08:00:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by yoda1canobe 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Your questions are the lamest that I have ever come across. What is the point of your question? If you can not ask an intelligent question then it is probably best not to bother. I imagine you to be an attention seeking uneducated person who wants to cause trouble.
2007-10-14 07:49:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by dogs3kids2hubby1 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
And the anti-McCanns don't have this problem?
I think anybody who is continually fussing over the McCanns, irrespective of sides should be contacting their doctor to arrange some psychiatric counselling - it can't natural to incessantly worry about something beyond your control.
2007-10-14 07:12:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Luke Warnes 4
·
6⤊
1⤋
Yep, Wikipedia, Google and Bablefish translator are essential tools for anyone on YA
2007-10-14 08:44:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
And another question about the McCanns
2007-10-14 07:13:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
why do people use the lame, lazy term 'pro McCann' to describe a group of people whose opinions are so disparate that to lump them all in one box is stupid?
only a stupid person would do such a thing
2007-10-14 07:27:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
How boring, more pointless "McCann pro" & "anti" questions... Why don't you actually ask something with some point to it.
2007-10-14 07:24:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
erm peculiar....it appears the link you gave isn't to a McCann question, it's a Mitchell question so your question doesn't make sense if you are using that link as your source.
2007-10-14 07:58:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by nusha 3
·
3⤊
0⤋