You're quite right. There's no place for prejudiced behaviour. well done for pointing that out.
2007-10-14 06:12:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
12⤊
5⤋
DAVE S, enough of this crapola.. You are more transparent than a pair of the Pussycat Dolls' g-strings.
To state the obvious, I sincerely hope that the poor lamb Madeleine is found soon, I don't think any decent human would disagree with you on that. I also think that many agree with you that the McCanns have behaved oddly - but that does not necessarily mean they killed their daughter.
I have to say one thing. Give it up Dave, we all know its you here and not ''theo"/"pdr"/"Jack H"/ "Adam"/"Dr Watson"/"AndrewT2", or any of the others that are quite obviously you. None of them exist outside your messed up mind. You used to make fantastic valid points before you grew another 20 identities. It's sad, the way you are wasting your writing talent on trolling when you actually have a lot of sense somewhere in your head.
You obviously want people to know it is you. None of those troll IDs tend to respond to anyone who makes a good, sound case against what they say. Just like you. Coincidence? Yeah, right. You don't bother even trying to disguise youself most of the time, and when you do, your deliberate misspellings are very obvious. Your style still comes through, and you answer all your own questions under your various IDs in quick succession. It is not hard to spot.
Whatever any of us think of your lunatic theories, nobody can deny that you are smart. So, here's one suggestion. When someone faults you, why not use your reasoning skills (which you clearly possess) to floor them instead of trite sniping? I remember watching you call clearly intelligent people illiterate, purely because you didn't agree with them, when in fact they are more articulate than yourself. It's tragic. Before you give the predictable answer, I am not sniping at you: I am stating facts. You know it.
2007-10-15 05:37:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Veritas The Great and Terraboil 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
You really are a low life to use this case is such a way to make an infantile point.
You have taken a topic and presented it so well out of proportion it is practically unrecognisable.
I know of the subject you are referring to and I know of no one in particular that is a McCann fan as you put it who was rude to this person. They did point out that they could not understand what the person was saying, but their was nothing to indicate that they were friend or foe.
In fact I myself tried to help the person in question by trying to explain to them that they could not be understood and that they did not make sense in the English interpretation. I did not say anything rude and I totally object to you inference that I did.
What a vile apology for a human being you are. Hiding behind your anonymous identity to make wild assumptions on people you know nothing about.
edit
Is this the same person who wrote this........
by Mrs Rebelo
You who is this is riduculous you never has all the thing constructive to say. You cannot read the facts in the notice, and you she always affixes right lots of personal commentaries of snidey. When she will be you who go to wake up above and to smell the roses you dirty Mccann pro.
and this...............
by Mrs Rebelo
You one is pro-McCann-McCann dirty and to supporter of the child who neglects scum, you need to wash for you are its mouth with soup that you do not believe the linkings that I affix. Who you thinks of that you it is. The wait joust until the inspector Rebelo and its team of the crack of the detectives arrests its friends absing of the child then that you you will not laugh.
and this....................
by Mrs Rebelo Member since: 13 October 2007
The dogs pro of McCann do not have no evidence that only want to make the amusement of the Potuguese, these pro-McCanns-McCanns think that he is funny that this poor child is lacking a person just of the abuse that wants Kate and Gerry McCann arrested for its crimes and recklessness. The excrement to have appropriate a defensive position for its is checicken too much idols Kate and Gerry McLiars.
Edit..............
I do not believe after reading some of these comments that this person actually is Portuguese. I think they are impersonating someone from Portugal in order to cause trouble. It amazes me that they can claim to be able to read and understand the facts but yet they cannot present them. All they had to do was copy and paste from the site they were reading from just as I have done here.
So that is YOUR little smear campaign right out the window.
17pdr ............... No........ just honest. I do not smear people for the sake of it unlike yourself. I state fact as it is seen not invented or twisted.
2007-10-14 13:27:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
5⤋
I'm p'd off by the way any question questioning the McCanns is answered with rudeness and sarcasm.by the McFanns I know there are some silly questions concerning the case but there are still interesting ones that don't necessarily fit into either the Pro or Anti camp. Sorry I haven't seen the stuff you're referring too, I never seem to know what extra curricular antics are going on on this site.
2007-10-14 13:15:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dr Watson (UK) 5
·
7⤊
7⤋
when ppl start resorting 2 insults it usually means they are getting desperate
2007-10-14 13:39:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by tasty 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
you couldnt really understand what she was saying a lot of the time though,,, be fair
2007-10-14 14:30:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
McCanns are as guilty as sin. If they hadnt have left maddie in the apartment then none of this would be happening.
2007-10-14 13:13:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by lisa . 2
·
11⤊
6⤋
some people will use a cause just to be obnoxious
2007-10-14 13:12:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
2⤋
Is this what you were talking about 'Adam' ?
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Anj3PJPmIotg.E2J8XWfVSwtLxV.;_ylv=3?qid=20071014062930AAmgkC9
EDIT - Helen O - LOL what a saint
2007-10-14 13:21:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by 17pdr 4
·
2⤊
5⤋
You are so very wrong.The most rude,abusive foul people on here are the antis,I dont mean all of them,but surely you can see that its people who actually show kindness to others that support the McCanns,we can sympathise with them and we dont just say they left them alone and so should suffer.
You really are so wrong.
Also I think you will find that this poor innocent person was very rude earlier,so before you ask such questions,check ALL the facts.
2007-10-14 13:14:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
11⤋