1500 dying of cancer daily, yer Bush has cut research funds for 7 years! Researchers are hurting for funds. Dr Cui at Wake Forest has a possible cure for cancer, yet his funds are cut. Embryonic stem cell research is cut by religious fanatics that knoe nothing of science!
2007-10-14 05:44:13 · 15 answers · asked by NAP BQ 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes. I used to think he was just stupid, a puppet for the rich and evil. Now I'm sure he's evil himself. Just look at his veto of HEALTH INSURANCE FOR CHILDREN! What next? Sweat shops? (Actually, the Daily Show did a skit on this, mocking Bush with a Dickensian "report" on children and the poor, and 'how lucky they was' to get jobs in workhouses!).
2007-10-14 05:53:25 · answer #1 · answered by Gwynneth Of Olwen 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
A monster may be a bit much. I don't know the man. Any way he is not alone. The president does not write laws or vote for their passage. He can only sign or veto as he sees fit. He can also influence. Large big money interest like the pharmaceutical companies, medical lobbyist and conservative think tanks have all contributed to the election coffers for both the Democratic and Republican parties. The desire to privatize everything government except the military while increasing the budget on big money give aways to the very rich is behind a lot of the government cut back in needed services. Look at S-CHIP, the money for infrastructure like bridges and levies, and aid to even help the veterans returning from his war. All these thing are being cut while the largest deficits ever produced are coming out of Washington. You go figure.
2007-10-14 06:57:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he isnt a monster and the stem cell issue is one of a religious nature. The solution to the stem cell research problem will be in office Jan of 2009.
The cancer research funding cut was a cut of funds going to those firms that had not produced any results over a period of many years. You don't throw away money for research on people that arent producing results.
2007-10-14 05:48:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mister President, you, sir, are mistaken. Show me a single executive order or piece of laws signed with the aid of President Bush that BANS stem cell study. Stem telephone study continues at present. Embryonic stem cellphone research continues in these days. What Bush banned was federal funding of embryonic stem mobilephone study, no longer the study itself. What "restrictions" on abortion did President Bush authorize via executive order? What "restrictions" on family planning did President Bush authorize with the aid of executive order? The answer to both is NONE. In case you have proof of such, publish it, or else, discontinue spreading lies.
2016-08-05 21:10:09 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why fund embryonic stem cell research when adult stem cell research has proven very effective? Adult stem cells have been used for decades to treat dozens of diseases including Type 1 diabetes,liver disease,and spinal cord injuries.Currently,adult stem cells are used to treat more than 80 different diseases. I see absolutely no reason to continue funding research with embryonic stem cells when so much progress has been made with adult stem cells as opposed to embryonic stem cells.
2007-10-14 06:50:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know nothing of science. Embryonic stem cell research has produced no potential.
Billions have been spent on cancer research over the years. Who is to say spending billions more will solve the problem.
I say get off the Bush bashing. Donate you own money if you wish.
2007-10-14 05:49:38 · answer #6 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Mister President, you, sir, are incorrect. instruct me a single govt order or piece of legislations signed by employing President Bush that BANS stem cellular examine. Stem cellular examine maintains immediately. Embryonic stem cellular examine maintains immediately. What Bush banned improve into federal investment of embryonic stem cellular examine, no longer the examine itself. What "regulations" on abortion did President Bush authorize by employing govt order? What "regulations" on family contributors making plans did President Bush authorize by employing govt order? the answer to the two is NONE. in case you have evidence of such, submit it, in any different case, end spreading lies.
2016-10-22 09:21:14 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cutting cancer research and children's health care are ways that he has shown his fiscal conservatism. Denying federal funds to stem cell research was a way that he showed his social conservatism. He may not be heartless, but the ideology he follows certainly is.
2007-10-14 05:55:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2007-10-14 05:48:00 · answer #9 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, he may be. I can't imagine why anyone would cut research funding.
2007-10-14 06:04:12 · answer #10 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋