They were also big advocates of gay marriage and gun bans.
2007-10-14 04:45:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by charbatch 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
What they advocated was not being an imbecile and assuming nothing in the world would ever change. They advocated people thinking for themselves, and not treated any human as gods.
Rather than idiotically assuming they knew everything that was going to happen in the future and laying down all laws for eternity, they left a structure, and amendable structure, and the idea that future generations should govern themselves.
2007-10-14 07:10:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sponge off daddy today, redistribute his wealth on the new Justin Timberlake , Or Britney Spears CD? You make a lot of noise for a kid who has no real world ( WORK)experience. Does the irony of you postings ever catch you? If Daddy died and left you nothing but debt and you had to work drop out of school and bust your ***....then what ? would you shout so loud and talk so bold?
TAX ONLY THE RICH
"We are all the more reconciled to the tax on importations, because it falls exclusively on the rich, and with the equal partition of intestate's estates, constitutes the best agrarian law.. Our revenues once liberated by the discharge of the public debt, and its surplus applied to canals, roads, schools, etc., and the farmer will see his government supported, his children educated, and the face of his country made a paradise by the contributions of the rich alone, without his being called on to spare a cent from his earnings."
--Thomas Jefferson to Thaddeus Kosciusko, 1811.
http://www.constitution.org/tj/jeff13.tx...
PROGRESSIVE TAXES
"The property of this country is absolutely concentred in a very few hands, having revenues of from half a million of guineas a year downwards... I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable. But the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there is in any country, uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right. The earth is given as a common stock for man to labor and live on."
--Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, October 28,1785. ME 19:17, Papers 8:682
2007-10-14 04:50:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
How much of your wealth has been redistributed? From your question are we supposed to think your are extraordinarily wealthy and are suffering mightily with the present system, afraid you will lose the big tax break Uncle George gave you? Or is it all in your wildest dreams?
2007-10-14 04:52:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
in the beginning, you're in fact incorrect; the bill has an modification to circumvent that. The healthcare bill as is stands, threatens to minimize insurance for abortions, era, no count if by using private insurance or no longer. Secondly, we don't get to compliment the place our taxes pass. i are not getting to compliment for my taxes to no longer pay for conflict or weapons or AIG or to pay a flesh presser that i do no longer trust. strengthen up and recover from it. Thirdly, females prefer abortions for all varieties of motives. frequently we predict of that people do no longer use beginning administration and don't prefer to "take accountability." Statistically, it is misguided. maximum females who've undesirable pregnancies and choose for abortions have been making use of a few form of beginning administration, which failed. many females (whose beginning administration has already failed) have not got money to enhance yet another baby and the social protection internet has no longer greater to help them - frankly, i might love my tax money to pass there. There are females who prefer abortions through fact they are donning too many toddlers (multiples, that could threaten the well being or progression of the others), or through fact they could desire to undergo maximum cancers therapy or through fact they have extreme diabetes. those varieties of females could desire to have their tactics in hospitals - private or public insurance could desire to disguise those.
2016-11-08 07:02:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by ross 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Massive debt and elective foreign wars!
2007-10-14 04:50:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'm still looking for "Air Force" in the Constitution, so far I haven't been able to find it.
2007-10-14 04:48:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Beating your head against the wall, still hasn't helped you tone down your rhetoric...has it???
But remember if at first you don't succeed try,try,try again.
2007-10-14 04:47:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
slavery. Also women not allowed to vote, having to shut up and submit to men..
2007-10-14 04:48:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
DSTR THAT WAS FUNNY,LOL.......JUST LIKE A DUMB BLOND BEATING HER HEAD AGAINST THE WALL, ALL THAT HAIR DYE DID THIS TO HER, LOL............
2007-10-14 04:53:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋