Where do these statistics come from???

Question

I saw a study that said 75% of Americans have smoked pot. What??? Did they admit, is it a guess?? It seemed weird.

Answer 1

Those statistics likely come from a poll where a few are asked a question regarding pot smoking. Polls can be misleading because of the way they ask questions they can derive the desired answers they wish to see, for example they could ask have you ever tried pot? if you answer yes then those numbers could be included in the numbers that said they have smoked pot. Though trying pot would be the same as smoked pot it is not the same as smoking pot.

I tried pot once (and I inhaled), it didn't give me a high or make me feel any different. I never tried again because when I tried it you were staring at a felony if caught.

By the way, I don't really disagree with those numbers, it really does seem the whole USA is smoking pot.

Answer 2

The study probably stated that '75% of people polled admitted they smoked pot' which means, the poll could have been taken in a drug rehab class as far as I know.

Answer 3

You have to look for who did the study/poll and how it was conducted, as well as for what purpose. There should be some "margin of error" built in. Most surveys attempt to gather information about the general public by taking a poll of, or studying a "representative group." For something like what you have read, the researcers would have likely gathered a cross-section of Americans, roughly equivalent in many aspects, like income levels, lifestyles, racial characteristics and such to the general population. The 75% statement is based on the group studied. It would be impossible to survey all Americans on anything.

Answer 4

the polls come from throughout and it rather is an exceptionally complicated concern how they are assembled. there are a number of agencies that spend numerous money and attempt working those polls. lots of the polls are not credible. for occasion there are numerous agencies that are fairly paid to grant republican leaning polls and polls that are paid to grant democratic top polls. All of those partisan pollsters must be thoroughly left out. There are polls from places like ARG, Battleground, Diageo, Gallup Rasmussen, etc plus numerous universities that attempt to be non-partisan of their predictions. those polls have a tendency to be semi near to fact (interior 5 factors) yet are not frequently spot on because of the fact there is numerous aspects that flow into polling. The polls frequently come from telephone conversations that are had with pollsters. Pollsters are allowed to call landlines in uncomplicated terms and not cellular-telephones (which many people sense impression the consequence of the polling because of the fact lots of individuals use cellular telephones in uncomplicated terms these days). they attempt to call a extensive sampling of individuals (consistent with probability some hundred or thousand people) and the 1st element they attempt to come to a decision is who's probable to vote interior the election and who isn't. After that they attempt to predict who will vote interior the election. for occasion in 2004 something like 20% of the individuals who voted have been below 30 years of age. This time around will there be extra suitable than 20% of individuals below thirty? Or will there be much less or a similar? element is no one fairly is primary with they should wager this is why all the polls get fairly distinctive consequences. while they have found out who they think of will vote for occasion 23% below 30 10% latino 30% over 50, they're going to take the consequence of the polling and fill it in. There good judgment is a lot extra complicated than this yet frequently the polling grants a coarse semi-precise estimation of public opinion.

Answer 5

Looks like someone is blowing smoke in your eyes

Answer 6

many times these are derived from anonymous survey mailings. you can't put much stock in this type of survey