The USA and it's few responsible allies work to stop genocide while being shat upon by much of the UN and it's less than honorable members.
The UN will pass meaningless resolutions and will perhaps recognize a genocide when 100 years have passed...much like our US Congress today
2007-10-14 02:36:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by gcbtrading 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The only thing that would stop genocide would be to lobotomize every human being at birth. Different things trigger genocide. For instance, Hitler was attacked by a Jew in his childhood and this led him to hate all Jews. The ability of humans to decide that if there is one bad apple in a bunch the whole barrel must be destroyed is endless. But I think most genocide is a result of greed. A group of people decide they want land that some other tribe holds and therefore they attempt to kill every member of that tribe. In the process, they dehumanize their "enemy" to make it easier to kill them. Burma is not a genocide as of yet, as they are seeking to kill anyone of a democratic bent, not any particular ethnic group. It's just a bunch of greedy men at the top who don't want to give up their toys.
2007-10-14 02:50:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by mommanuke 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
UN won't do squat and when countries try to stop it they get demonized.
For example US to stop saddam.
The UN will make lots of pretty promises but won't do anything.
When countries that have the worst human rights records are in control of the human rights in the UN should tell you something.
2007-10-14 02:36:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It happened to and by the American indian The U N and Canada now there is a combo!
2007-10-14 02:48:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is there any good Turk the following on Y!A that even can re-study the info in well-known way, with out spreading the dislike and insulting innocuous victims? luckily, there are turkish human beings which comprise Orhan Pamuk. What about human beings in this communicate board? they are in accordance to their professional authorities it really is really elementary at the same time as it is composed of leaving in the back of free speech. Even for Nobel prize winners. i do not see something wonderful in that. rather those who declare that Armenians were back-stabbers. For who? For those that conquered them ,see you later as different international locations who were revolt adversarial to Ottoman Turks. You human beings would factor your magical reflect to different aspect, in basic terms see how diverse is image of you on your eyes and in eyes of others. shame on you! For the record: it DID happen!
2016-10-21 03:32:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go all the way back to Babylon and Babel it was there too.
They have been trying for millenniums to wipe out the Jew.
Must be something to do with that sin nature you hear about.
2007-10-14 02:36:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Genocide can only be stopped militarily, which means the UN will do nothing.
2007-10-14 02:33:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Give the UN a REAL Army, and let the UN end the genocide.
Genocide can only be ended by military force.
2007-10-14 02:34:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Villain 6
·
1⤊
1⤋