Please provide brief Reason for your answers ..
Cuurent Requirement to win for india " 32 Runs in 11balls"
2007-10-14 00:21:11 · 10 answers · asked by Inder 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
i dont think so ..........aussies r playing really gud cricket.......
2007-10-14 00:41:13 · answer #1 · answered by afra m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
India after a sluggish start up paced their innings, attributable to the skipper's knock and Dinesh Kartik belligerent comprehend. Chasing such wide objective Australia were in a sorry start up folding below 70.
2016-10-21 03:28:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
India lost the match, which they should have won. I feel sending Dravid earlier than yuvaraj Singh and robin uthappa was a tactical mistake and India had to pay dearly for that.
2007-10-14 02:45:21 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aussies have already defeated the Indians.
I think we all must agree that -----
Australians are the 50-50 champs
and------
Indians are champs of the 20-20
2007-10-14 03:56:12 · answer #4 · answered by ♣~Casie~♣ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Australia
cuz india have already lost by 18 runs
they got another great bowler
'M.Jhonson'
2007-10-14 02:49:37 · answer #5 · answered by Neil 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they won't.Thye,like alway have proven that they are a virtual cycle stand.One wicket gone and everyone starts making a bee-line for the dressing room.
2007-10-14 00:30:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe
2007-10-14 02:42:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think so....
honestly....ozs may be rude and play mind games....but they have got good cricket talent as well....
2007-10-14 00:29:46 · answer #8 · answered by vish_uk 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
indians would win
2007-10-14 00:23:30 · answer #9 · answered by Christine B 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no
2007-10-14 00:51:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋