This illegal war was sold to us by the media using the lies provided by the Bush adm. and kept sanitized by main stream media, it is no wonder to me that we can't the truth from the press ,,when watch CNN and they break to commercial the 1st on is from big oil the 2nd from Rx.drug makers. My best friend is a Capt. in the Air Force he is also a O-R Tech. When he was just in Iraq working it the hospital (green zone) he was shelled day and night, he told me that at any time "he couldn't spit in any direction without hitting a kid (soldier) who was missing at least one leg / arm" 1/3 of the KIDS injured in this war have suffered brain damage from the bombs..."Turning there brains to MUSH" Its no secret that Bush thinks he is on a mission from "God" because God chose him to usher in Armageddon plus,, Sodom was getting ready to sell his oil to China at a lower price than the "big oil" co.s and they would have had to earn a few billion less in profits, so Bush being there PUPPET has spent more of the American tax payers hard earned $$$ than all the Presidents before him All Combined !! He has injured 40,000 and killed 4000 troops ,He has murdered 100s of 1000s of innocent Iraqis ! This should be front page news every day and so should his trial for war crimes, and when he is found guilty of High Treason he should be publicly EXICUTED!
2007-10-13 22:18:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
There's not going to be any signifigant progress. Bush's newest plan seems to be this: He figures the Dems will win the next election because of this very war, so he'll keep our troops there and make the Democrats do the dirty work of removing our troops. Then, when Iraq evidently gets even bloodier afterwards, the Republicans will blame the Democrats for it, even though all we were doing there since 2004 was treading water, making no progress and Iraq never had a shot at becoming a "democracy and ally in the war on terror" as long as we tried to win the war with so few troops. So, until our troops come home, some of them will have to die so the Republicans can try and score the cheapest of political points against the Democrats. That's how it works.
2007-10-13 22:17:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
each and every American is holds the duty for the death cost made out of the invasion. regardless of the truth that many diverse communities did make the death tole so large, united states performed the function of the initiator. less than Saddam there become orderly violence and deaths. Now we ought to decide on what's more suitable ideal, chaotic violence or the orderly violence less than Saddam. As a question more suitable for interest i might want to opt for to understand what usa are you from. What you should understand is likewise that this warfare is compared to WW2, our usa isn't at warfare. Our president become questionably elected it really is also instruct of united states's competition of the warfare. in basic terms 27% of yank's nonetheless help the warfare. i might want to ask you no longer to confer with American coverage as united states's view as an finished. we are a rustic divided, some human beings do no longer communicate for all. properly we are able to verify if united states has replaced with the 2008 elections. The elections in 2006 would were a instruct united states's new perspectives.
2016-10-21 03:26:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Number of American Deaths in War
Revolutionary War 4,435
War of 1812 2,260
Mexican War 13,283
Civil War 623,026
Spanish American War 2,446
World War I 116,708
World War II 407,316
Korean War 36,914
Vietnam War 58,169
Persian Gulf 269
Yep, I'd say those were pretty good numbers compared to the above.
2007-10-13 22:49:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hummm, The president stated Gen. Petraeus and U.S.Amb. Crocker reported the war is making progress, most people see through all this rhetoric--this president is itching to start a war with Iran---Congress DO SOMETHING, QUICKLY, please........
2007-10-17 17:17:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joan J 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
What is the point of a war if you don't kill anyone? I think 4 to 58 is a pretty good ratio.
2007-10-13 21:43:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chef 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Ditto Mr M
A nightmare for most & a goldmine for others.
2007-10-13 22:40:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Which country will the Chimp invade next?
2007-10-14 03:41:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
and Sanchez must be right because he is critical of the war right...he can't be bitter for losing his job at all...all criticism of the war must be viewed as truth...come on...how generals did Lincoln go through in order to get the job done...
2007-10-13 21:46:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by turntable 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
did US army go to iraq to teach the rogues the bible?
2007-10-17 21:33:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋