English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

give me specifics, dont just argue vaguely.

With such a staggering number of homeless, and millions leaving the country altogether. Not to mention the widespread poverty, and deaths from the death squards.

And now the deaths that fall out of the civilian contractors.

Lets not forget there was not an Al Queda (IRAQ) until after america removed Saddam and contributed to the chaos in the coutnry for 4 years now.

There is so much corruption in the policing agencies, the army, and the politicians.
To the point where recently politicians went on record saying there will not be a federal government effort.
This is why all the talks have resurfaced for partitioning the country.

NO ONE CAN ARGUE THIS IRAQ POLICY WAS A BLUNDER.
WHEN ARE PEOPLE GOING TO WISE UP AND REMOVE THAT IDIOT WHO LED US INTO IRAQ IN THE FIRST PLACE

(either take out Saddam and the move to other coutries like Dufur, Colombia, etc -- or dont propogate you are trying to help the people, if you wont do for other countrys

2007-10-13 19:58:15 · 11 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

GIVE DETAILS -- dont just say, a ton of ways

2007-10-13 20:03:11 · update #1

free democracy -- filled with corrupt poticians NO ONE CAN ARGUE.
So why is that a bnefit???

2007-10-13 20:04:05 · update #2

If you cant give real specifics...then shame on all you bush supporters fornot being able to show why you argue FOR Bush even still.

2007-10-13 20:05:01 · update #3

11 answers

All I see is, that US has definitly benifitted out of the Iraq occupation - as a base in Middle East when they are being forced out of Saudi and Kuwait, Control on Oil, Rich Uranium and Mercury for Nukes, and jobs for so many!!!

I hold Iraqis themselves responsible for not being benifitted!! A lot of Iraqis cursed Saddam to have built canals, bridges, flyovers roads and not have made a Football Stadium!! Many thought the world would help terminate Saddam's caln and then leave - this if it had happened would have been a chaotic Civil War. The biggest problem with Iraqis is that the as not true to themselves and would cheat even themselves. The normal saying there is that "An Iraqi would cheat money off his bedridden mother's life saving drug even during her last moments!!"

Also a lot of the responsibilty lies on the neighbouring countries - whose busiessmen have been sponsoring terrorism for fear of loosing market to the Iraqi Market that might turn to the old Mesopotamian days should peace prevail; then the neighbouring countries rulers who are scared that should Democracy be a success they would loose power in their own country so sponsor terrorism!!

Do you think by partioning Iraqs problems would solve??

2007-10-13 22:35:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i've got not got something against Iraqi circuses. you be attentive to they do have spell examine in here. If the US replaced into occupied via Muslim forces i might combat. it could be as undesirable as being decrease than Nazi profession.

2016-11-08 06:30:25 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Actually... you're the one who isn't giving any specifics... if I'm reading your question right, you would like us to believe that:

1. WE created the homeless situation there and it did not exist before our arrival, though you show NO evidence of this.

2. Millions are leaving the country because of US. Where's your evidence of this?

3. What Death Squads? We have Death Squads in there? This is OUR doing? I'm sure Bush personally ordered them, since you obviously are another Bush Derangement Syndrome sufferer.

4. Deaths from Civilian Contractors. Wow. Rush to judgment like all the other Liberal Morons.... like Jack Murtha calling those Marines cold blooded killers... and now it turns out that they were completely justified in the shootings... so is Murtha going to apologize? Of course not. Neither will you, for assuming the Blackwater employees are guilty! More 'propaganda' and 'speculation'.

5. WHAT proof do you have that there were NO Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq prior to our invasion? Any? Thought not. You don't even have proof that there aren't sleeper cells in your own neighbourhood. You're hardly an authority on any of this.

6. WE contributed to the chaos in the country? OK, so the mass murder of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis by Saddam was ok because it was a more tolerable type of chaos to you?

7. Where is your evidence of all this so-called corruption? Do you know there is for a fact or are you speculating again?
Are you SO sure that the reason they made such statements about the Federal Government efforts had anything to do with corruption?

8. "NO ONE CAN ARGUE THIS IRAQ POLICY WAS A BLUNDER"
Well, not with you they can't, because you're a product of an ignorant populace buying into the Liberal propaganda. You might want to ask Hillary about it. When you do, ask her if she remembers WHY she said she and Bill were AWARE of the WMDs that Saddam had and that he had a nuclear program underway. Funny, she doesn't remember that now, so I guess it's a good thing she said it on tape, right?

So sorry. I'm not giving you the evidence you WANTED... because you're NOT going to like the evidence I HAVE. Such is the Liberal mindset. It only can accept what it wants to hear.

Remove Bush?
There is NO impeachable offense to even suggest doing so.
There is NO reasonable argument to consider it.
HOWEVER...

Remove Nancy Pelosi:
According to the law, she committed treason. That's right. Treason. She went to Syria claiming to represent the US. She doesn't. Condy Rice does. I know it must go up Nancy's backside to have another woman able to do things she can't, since she's the self-professed most powerful woman in the world... but look it up. It's in the Constitution. She not only went there under false pretenses but she proceeded to LIE to Assad about a message she supposedly brought from the Israeli Prime Minister. She should be removed from office immediately... and tried for treason.

Remove Howard Dean:
Howard Dean has ADMITTED to having 'clandestine meetings with foreign leaders' (treason, remember) and telling them to ignore the current administration and wait for the Democrats to take power. Sounds like he's planning a coup. Treason and revolutionary implications. Why is he still the head of the DNC and not sitting in a cell?

Remove Harry Reid:
By taking words out of context and not even bothering to look up what was actually said before hopping on the chance to use his Congressional position to condemn a PRIVATE CITIZEN (Rush Limbaugh) he abused his power and made false accusations (which is illegal as well) in the interest of politics. Call for his resignation!

Remove Jack Murtha:
For declaring heroes... US Marines in the service of our country...defending your right to spout your anti-Bush rhetoric here... cold blooded killers... before any such conviction had been handed down... and then refusing to apologize when they were cleared... he should be forced to resign.

Investigate Hillary Clinton:
By naming Sandy Bergman an 'informal advisor', she created probable cause to look into her involvement with his theft and subsequent destruction of classified documents from the national archive, a crime he has confessed to committing.
WHY is she offering a crook a job? What was IN those documents that she doesn't want him to divulge? Why has he not taken the polygraph test he was ordered to take as part of his lenient sentence... is it because once he tells what was in those documents, Hillary is out of the election and he's out of a cushy job?


Now, there are plenty of strides being made over in Iraq... schools are being built... infrastructure being upgraded... and civil rights are being enjoyed by groups who have never had them before, like women. However, NO ONE owes you ANY proof or specifics considering your question is riddled with inaccuracies you portray as fact with no supporting evidence and your intent is born of contempt for Bush and your derangement therein.
I'd suggest you seek some help for that... and open your mind to more than the Liberal propaganda you've obviously been soaking in.

2007-10-13 20:43:33 · answer #3 · answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3 · 0 1

A lot of them are now enjoying their 72 virgins.

2007-10-13 21:57:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

heres your specific liberal...the kurds were being ethnicly cleansed by saddam. with the us that stopped. in simple english, under saddam death, the us life. real simple, even for a liberal.

2007-10-14 01:32:19 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 1

no one is really ever "free" ...more so, especially the ones that think they are....ALL politics is inherently corrupt...the U.S. is in its "last days' as an empire (and civilization as we know it).
Coming up next...prison planet, bought to you buy the makers of computers with contributions made by the world's central bankers...

2007-10-13 20:42:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

there is definatley no reason for us to be in Iraq anymore, and i think Bush is just trying to show up his father, becasue H W Bush couldnt catch Hussein!!! but that is just my opinon.

2007-10-13 20:01:41 · answer #7 · answered by Sarah 2 · 1 2

Oh, there are TONS of ways ...but you won't see them on CNN - Clinton News Network

Woman are allowed to walk freely outdoors without having to cover their face

Saddam is dead

People are not brainwashed and made to obey rediculious orders of Saddam

They have a democracy

They have a government

Men and Woman are both allowed to vote.

Shall I go on ?


P.S.... You seem to be on a rage ...are you ok? Can we help you?

2007-10-13 20:00:39 · answer #8 · answered by ValleyR 7 · 1 4

By population decrease. You can see, how many iraqis are dying each day so obviously Iraqis benefited in population control aspect.

2007-10-13 20:01:45 · answer #9 · answered by cute-pie25 2 · 1 3

It's a lot less crowded now.

2007-10-13 20:00:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers