Like if privacy is remove then there is no meaning to freedom. every body has right to freedom no body is entitled to enter any body personal life. Like if we talk about celebrities or big personalities, who make them celebrities definately public but on which groud definately good performance in their work not on there personal life performance.
Please suggest to me some more good point on this basis
I would greatfull to you in future.
Regards
Vaibhav
2007-10-13 17:45:19 · 5 answers · asked by Vaibhav T 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Yes, I think even celebrities deserve some measure of privacy. Entertainment is a profession like any other, and no one should have to be "on duty" 24 hours a day. When a celebrity is out doing their thing, fine, but when they're at home or running errands or trying to enjoy a vacation, they should be considered "off duty" and not subject to invasions of privacy.
Also, who defines what a celebrity is? Does someone who isn't an entertainer, but makes the news, a celebrity? People in the news aren't always famous by their own choice, and they especially should have their private lives respected.
2007-10-13 18:03:30 · answer #1 · answered by R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
human beings ought to stay in a society and hence everybody’s moves and existence (inner most & public) may have some effect on different human beings. So a political candidate may have any style of existence although that is going to be interior a decrease. assume a cushty flesh presser misuses his skill and develops more suitable-marital affair consisting of his secretary. This eventually makes her pregnant. Then the lady and the newly shaped infant also comes into image. guy needs to be managed in all factors of his existence. Even a small infant needs to be now and again threatened from doing mischiefs. it really is why we've constitutions, rules, authorities. yet synthetic rules are with many flaws. it really is why always amendments are being made to the nationwide constitutions. above a majority of those, the perfect administration for guy is his personal self administration. a thanks to attain this? that is via faith and the phobia of God. you opt for to be non secular on some foundation. And that foundation is faith. U ought to perceive the right faith. faith skill course of existence.
2016-10-21 03:15:41 · answer #2 · answered by butkovich 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You and I may agree that yes, all celebrities are entitled to their privacy. However, we are outnumbered by their fans who are so eager to find out anything about them. Right or wrong, these people constitute a "market" that papparazis fill, and magazines and TV shows make their money on. It is an industry by itself that is worth billions of dollars.
All this publicity is the groundwork for their movies and shows to make money, and people will line up to pay money into the movie houses, watch TV , buy records, CDS, etc.
If nobody cared, will these people get paid millions of dollars to make movies that no one will watch? No?
2007-10-13 18:35:45 · answer #3 · answered by QuiteNewHere 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To a degree - but when they try to influence policy because they once had a hit song or played a role..they open themselves up to scrutiny .
2007-10-13 19:04:15 · answer #4 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no.
2007-10-14 06:05:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋