In his sophomore year at Harvard, Gore's grades were lower than any semester recorded on Bush's transcript from Yale. That was the year Gore's classmates remember him spending a notable amount of time in the Dunster House basement lounge shooting pool, watching television, eating hamburgers and occasionally smoking marijuana. His grades temporarily reflected his mildly experimental mood, and alarmed his parents. He received one D, one C-minus, two C's, two C-pluses and one B-minus, an effort that placed him in the lower fifth of the class for the second year in a row.
For all of Gore's later fascination with science and technology, he often struggled academically in those subjects.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A37397-2000Mar18
2007-10-13
17:16:50
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Okay, how 'bout this one:
Einstein was thought to be a retard when he was in school.
"Nothing in his childhood suggested any vestige of genius. Just the opposite, there was reason to believe young Albert was slow! Even at the age of nine, he lacked the ability to speak fluently. His parents suspected that maybe he was less than normal since he required extra time to compose answers to questions posed to him. His teacher remarked to his father that it does not matter in which profession he would choose, he would never succeed."
2007-10-13 17:40:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I went to most of the main properly known colleges on the East Coast. just about all my instructors have been Liberals, and that they warned me approximately human beings such as you! fortuitously, I keep in mind their words of awareness. while i might get an answer incorrect, they had tell me to no longer concern, because of the fact perfection isn't in human nature. they actually boosted my self-properly worth. They jogged my memory that present day society is extremely interdependent, so i do no longer could have all the solutions. in fact, as Robin Williams stated, "80% of existence is basically showing up". you're probable between the brainy young babies who have been given the utmost grades. properly, in my colleges you does no longer have been so proud. My instructors informed me i became basically tremendously much as good as you. Getting the respond appropriate isn't the suitable purpose of guidance. Having a fondness for understanding is incredibly what's paramount. So while Mr. Gore (just about "Mr. President") lectures us, we could continually forget approximately approximately his incredibly scholastic checklist. to boot, his instructors have been probable some nit-picky Conservative that had no longer something greater effective to do than seek for small faults. C'mon, that is not as though we are all construction nuclear bombs. Who cares if there are occasional errors? no person's gonna die for Christ sake! you may think of Mr. Gore is a hypocrite, yet he's basically passionate with regard to the assumption of synthetic climate exchange. Who cares if a number of his info are misguided? Who fairly provides a flying fig if his concept would be incorrect? he's spreading his hobby approximately he atmosphere, and that's what fairly concerns, would not it?. . . . . . . in case you think of i'm a Libby, i've got accidentally punk'd you. My apologies. this is in basic terms a satire of popular Libby thinking. heavily, you may examine nonsense like this daily on YA.
2016-10-20 07:13:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
So, then, using your logic, then because of poor college grades, both Bush and Gore should be completely discredited and neither should be considered qualified to hold their position? I mean, you're stating that Gore's grades were worse than Bush's, but Bush's weren't all that impressive either. But then again, since few of us could ever hope to get into Harvard or Yale, I suppose you're saying you'd last more than a semester and graduate with honors, right? Sure. Maybe they were both legacies, maybe they actually both would have flunked without their parent's influence.
But maybe, just maybe, their college grades really aren't that important and have nothing to do with whether man is responsible for global warming?
2007-10-13 17:23:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Yet, he still grew up to be more of a man then you will ever be. Grades are snap shots,transitional- abbreviations of time, time has proved if anything, Gore is a force of will.
If you have legitimate, serious problems with Gore by all means post a question, this one---is a non-issue.
2007-10-13 17:21:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
3⤋
Hahah
2007-10-13 17:35:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Look who has become a failiure and who has become successful at thier work. I think that counts the most. I dont think there is a nobel prize award for creating breeding grounds for terrorists.
2007-10-13 17:30:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by MyMysteryId 3
·
7⤊
2⤋
Gore is an idiot and so is Bush, and Clinton
2007-10-13 18:54:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by masterplumber1975 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
So what grade did Bush get is military strategy at Yale?
and you still elected him to run a war??
2007-10-13 17:34:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
You know what's sad?
In '00 and '04, we were fighting over which C-average student should run this country. Just sayin' lol...
EDIT: Kerry I believe also had mediocre grades.
2007-10-13 17:22:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Liberals love America! 6
·
7⤊
2⤋
Who among us truly believes that the grades one receives in classes is truly the measure of a man (or woman)?
2007-10-13 17:22:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋