to confuse people into thinking global warming on Earth is due to he sun... when the article they posted says nothing about it?
This article that some con posted says nothing about the sun warming Jupiter. It says Jupiter is moving on its 70 year cycle, meaning it is getting "warmer near the equator and cooler at the poles."
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/04/21_jupiter.shtml
2007-10-13
16:57:00
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Heartland.org. Wow sounds like a legit scientific organization to me.
2007-10-13
17:03:23 ·
update #1
Steele,
I thought scientists were doing this for the global warming money, but you're telling me they are socialists?
Which conpiracy theory do cons believe in most?
2007-10-13
17:04:43 ·
update #2
Dark,
I did not use berkely. A CON used this source.
2007-10-13
17:05:19 ·
update #3
I don't post links to websites as you claim, I just ask that you stop running from these questions about your theory:
1 - What percentage of current climate change is attributable to man-made factors, and what percentage is attributable to random variation of the sun?
2 - Why is warming occurring on Mars?
3 - Why will the coders of global climate models not release their computer code?
4 - How are temperatures pre-1700 validated?
5 - Why do global climate models predict future warming, even when *RANDOM* values are input for past temperatures?
I'll also complain that you maintain that "consensus" is science, and that you use a bivariate causal analysis when many variables are involved.
2007-10-16 23:27:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the mind of a Con, all they need to convince themselves of something is a semi-related story. Even though Jupiter is a completely different planet with a totally different atmosphere, Cons will accept that as proof. Just more proof of how scary the Cons can be.
Atmosphere is what controls the temperature entering as well as escaping our planet. When we pump billions of tons of pollution into the atmosphere every day, it has its effects on our environment. How hard is that idea to grasp?
I'm convinced that Cons and Reps only dispute the idea that humans are responsible for the warming of the earth because Al Gore is a spokes person about global warming. Had it been someone from their side they would agree. They know that if they agree with Al Gore on any issues then they'll be forced to acknowledged some of his other ideas so just fight everything that comes from the left, even if it's irrelevant to politics. Al Gore could say the sky is blue and the Cons/Reps will fight tooth and nail that the sky is in fact green. It's really sad to see what the conservative party has devolved into. Just another reason not to vote for these clowns.
2007-10-15 11:59:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am still wondering, why they keep posting links to Heartland org when it is about as biased and credible as OSIM.
to answer your question, because it supports their delusional conclusions. That is what they do. look for and spin facts to support their beliefs, rather than change their beliefs to match the real facts.
What is really funny, is the people who claim Warming is occuring on Mars, Jupitor, and Pluto, while claiming the sun is causing it. Why is this so hilarious? Because most of that warming is speculation. Not anything concrete. The same people have been claiming Mars has water on it, when scientists are only detecting Hydrogen, which doesn't have to be water, especially in the absence of O2. Meanwhile they ignore the fact that Venus isn't warming outside of any normal weather patterns. Would almost seem to be a requirement to link the sun, considering it is closer to the sun the the other ones named.
2007-10-13 17:12:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
How about this one:
http://www.heartland.org/
From actual climatologists.
Your Marxist politics is not science its just a really good attempt to defeat capitalism. Too bad the scientific community is shying away from your religion like Mexicans fleeing Mexico.
I'm telling you that most of the "scientists" who claim Global Warming (which peaked in 1998) is man-made are perpetuating this myth for their grants, but the real force behind the GW cult are politicians trying to further Marxist economic policies.
Heartland boasts perhaps the foremost expert on climatology Dr S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia. But please feel free to ignore the alternative research and continue praying to your Global Warming god.
You know cavemen were afraid of the sun too. Oh you enlightened intellectuals you.
2007-10-13 17:01:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Global Warming is not caused by man. It's caused by a normal cycle. Libs are not smart enough to realize that. How do you explain it was hotter 100 years ago than it is now when there weren't millions of cars on the road and thousands of airplanes in the sky to pollute the air?
2007-10-13 17:05:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by AmericanPatriot 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
what is the "normal" temperature of the earth. yalls favorite scientists, evolution experts say our ancestors had to live underground for 2 million years living off deep root water because the earth dried up so much it was uninhabitable. was that the normal temperature or did our ancestors just like SUVs. thumbs down over here----->
since we all know you dont actually care about science just the politics,
2007-10-13 17:09:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by CaptainObvious 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Remember most Republicans/conservatives accept that human activity is changing our climate. Even Dubya is now on board.
There are some extremists that feel a need to marginalize themselves on this issue - and the post/article you refer to just demonstrate how desperate they have become.
2007-10-13 17:09:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hilarious. I have a neo-buddy who stated that Mars was getting warmer and this was proof that Earth was not being affected by people.
Neo-cons already have their half baked CONclusions. They just line up propaganda to support their non-logic.
2007-10-13 17:01:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Everything is not a political issue ; and who really concerns themselves with what convicts are debating ..at least they're locked up .
2007-10-13 17:15:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
using berkeley as your source is really sad. no-one can take you seriously with references like that.
mars is also getting warmer. maybe if al gore and robert kennedy quit using their private jets to go to the corner store for beer then mars might stabilize.
2007-10-13 17:02:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋