If she does it'll be such a long process that she'd never get any credit for it. We're in too deep with that stupid NAFTA crap. All we can hope for is, for whomever that gets elected, to not dig the "outsourcing" hole any deeper. If we had a "MAJOR" war, we'd be in a heap 'o trouble 'cause we are losing our whole manufacturing base.
2007-10-13 14:23:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by charlie the 2na 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's a huge task.
If we stop outsourcing, all of the stores will be empty in a month. It would take time for America to rebuild factory production.
In the long run, it's a good idea. A 12,000 mile supply line from China only works when the climate is stable, oil is cheap, and we're not at war.
If that 12,000 mile supply is interrupted we're going to wish we could make things right here at home.
2007-10-13 14:18:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Question Monster 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Outsourcing is not always the evil it is portrayed to be. You have learned a word but forgot to learn its' meaning.
Just supose a company does a lot of printing, such as a bank. Business has expanded to the point where it's print shop cannot handle the volume. So, it decides to close the print shop and contract out the work to a local printer.
The local printer now has to expand and hire more people and hires the people that formerly worked in the print shop of the bank, plus several more new people.There is a net gain in jobs. Since when is this bad?.
Don't just throw a word around to male someone look bad or good.
2007-10-13 14:16:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by TedEx 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
If outsourcing to foreign nations could be ended by Hilary Clinton, she will be a hero to the American working public. I lost 2 jobs to outsourcing, so if ending outsourcing is one of her goals, she has my vote
2007-10-14 09:57:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by xg6 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way, her and Bill or the king and queen of outsourcing, to heck with jobs here. Leaving a partially solved problem to a possible future President Clinton is a poor option.
2007-10-13 14:28:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by lilly4 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
interior u . s ., NAFTA changed into able to guard passage after bill Clinton made its passage a significant legislative precedence in 1993. convinced. bill Clinton made NAFTA achieveable. The North American loose commerce settlement (NAFTA) eradicated the final public of value lists on products traded between u . s ., Canada and Mexico, and steadily phased out different value lists over a 10-365 days era. consisting of motor vehicles, computers, textiles, and agriculture.
2016-10-09 04:28:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is stupid. You want to end outsourcing then get rid of minimum wage.
2007-10-13 14:34:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by poke 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not hardly. She promotes higher taxes on business which is an incentive to move production elswhere.
2007-10-13 14:15:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Charles C 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I hope not, our President Bush does not want that protectionism stuff here and we still have a ways to go to desocialize the socialist military with private firms!
2007-10-13 14:13:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
why would she? Her husband passed NAFTA. Why don't people ask about Kerry and outsourcing?
2007-10-13 14:12:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by rizinoutlaw 5
·
1⤊
1⤋