English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is that a fair compromise?

people would still be able to protect their homes from invaders

it would be difficult/impossible for criminals to rob people on the street, burgle homes (because the rifle is so big)

the sickos who like to kill animals for fun will still be able to kill for fun

no concealed weapons on the streets

2nd amendment isn't violated. you still have a right to bear arms.

less crime, of course

the list goes on and on. of course there would have to be some exceptions, like law enforcement. they would still be allowed handguns and SWAT would still be allowed the more powerful guns.

2007-10-13 13:19:01 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

31 answers

The 2nd Amendment is not negotiable!...Your simplistic view of gun ownership reflects your naivety. If firearm ownership frightens you so, immigrate to England and protect yourself with an umbrella...

2007-10-13 14:08:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers