When will Congress pass a resolution recognizing the genocide against Iraq?

Question

I'm talking about 205,000 Iraqis killed during the Gulf War, after U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie told Saddam the U.S. had no position on his conflict with Kuwait.

I'm talking about 1 million Iraqis who died from preventable disease and starvation due to sanctions. Only the U.S. and Britain refused to lift these sanctions, even though Iraq had already destroyed its WMD and complied with the UN ceasefire.

And I'm talking about the 655,000+ dead in Bush's unprovoked war of aggression, which violates the UN charter and US and international law.

Somebody in the future is going to have a lot of apologizing to do.

Answer 1

In case you don't know.............people always
die in wars. The aggression was when terrorists
came to America and bombed the world trade
center and killed 3000 completely innocent
people in and around those buildings. Bush
was not thinking "war" before this happened.
Quit being anti-American........we cannot just
ignore threats and murders against US.

Answer 2

The US was clear about opposing any Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Official transcripts of the meetings make that obvious. Your first lie.

Sanctions did NOT kill anybody, food and medical supplies were available. Your buddy Saddam just chose to do things like building dozens of new palaces instead of taking care of his people. Your second lie.

Almost all Iraqis killed since the US invaded have been killed by other Iraqis (AKA the terrorists you constantly support), not US troops. Your third lie (or misrepresentation if that makes you feel better).

US action against Saddam does not violate the UN charter and is not a breach of any law the US is subject to. Your fourth lie.

I really doubt congress will pass any resolution over your lies. You'll have to lower your expectations..

And regardless, even if all your lies were actually true.. it doesn't amount to genocide. Take some time and actually look up what the word means.

Answer 3

Turkish troops have been working on the two aspects of the border for it slow now. the information is that extra troops are crossing. If Bush have been sensible, he might motivate Turkish troops to mass alongside the border to guard Turkish voters against the PKK (and to convey abode those already in Iraq). we've earned multiple credibility with the Kurds, and we are in a position to rigidity them to act.

Answer 4

Your death toll is grossly over stated, which is normal for a lib to start an argument with. You also forgot about oil for food, Saddam had the money to feed his people but chose to build HUGE statues of himself and palaces. Have you bothered to look up how many children have been vaccinated since US dollars are flowing into Iraq now or the fact that their GDP is 13% better then the US. The onlu persons who will owe an apoligy will be you and other liberals, to our troops for not believing in the good they are doing.

Answer 5

or the 2.5 million Vietnamese killed, or the 1 million Filipinos killed. The 2 million American Indians killed. The list goes on. America can't make hypocritical legislation like that

Answer 6

like a 1000 yrs. so all the people who helped started this no-reason war will be dead & dont have 2 apologize.

Answer 7

Your statements are libelous. Also you are wrong as usual. Congress would not pass such a totally ridiculous resolution.
In war people die. War is hell.
I think you should apologize to Y! A users for trying to spread hatred against the US on this site.

Answer 8

There is no genocide in Iraq. Nice, deluded try though. Only in your world will there be an expectation of apologies.

Answer 9

If we still have the same system of Government in the Future.

Answer 10

oh we'll declare it but we have to wait a hundred years like we did with Armenian genocide.