This goes for both cons and libs. Is it common to elect officials who so blindly vote on life and death issues?
2007-10-13 12:49:47 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe if they didn't comply, they'd find out why Bush is so persistent about keeping wiretapping here in the US.
2007-10-13 12:55:49 · answer #1 · answered by ck4829 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they went blindly with him, at the time they all believed that Iraq was a threat, even Hilliary. Now when things go wrong they do the natural thing for people in power, they throw the dirt on somebody else and blame him.
2007-10-13 12:56:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your assumptions are in error. The people in Congress did do their homework. They knew exactly what they were voting for and why they voted for it.
No one "blindly" voted for anything. Politicians prove they have something to offer to their constituents, or they don't get voted in.
If you say elected officials made mistakes, you are also saying voters made mistakes. You will never convince anyone of that.
2007-10-13 12:54:40 · answer #3 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The assumed they could trusts Bush's word. They were wrong.
2007-10-13 12:55:09 · answer #4 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
How many times do you have to hear it, it is a fair and just war, pay attention Saddam needed to be removed, and we need the oil for our HUMMERS!
2007-10-13 12:54:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
They did, and they made the right decision to go to war with Iraq.
http://www.truewordtoday.blogspot.com
2007-10-13 12:52:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋