ok i have one for all you law freaks out ther ok here it is.....
the DA has a case that has been buliding for almost a year then 2 days before it gos to trial the DA might have to drop the case because the DA victum did not tell the truth because the witness that the DA needs tells the truth about thecase that confums the defances statments now here is the thing i need to know the same vic. in the nest case just made another complant how cridible will the DA take the nest complant that the same vic. that just lied to the DA will take this pperson and what might happen to the nest case that this person has ????/
2007-10-13 12:40:55 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I'm sorry, but I cannot answer your question. Your question is complete unintelligible. Please correct your spelling and grammer so that we can understand what you have written and provide you with an answer.
2007-10-13 12:46:58 · answer #1 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He'll probably either drop it or try to find other people to corroborate their statements.
2007-10-13 12:49:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huh?
2007-10-13 12:48:48 · answer #3 · answered by Diane M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I agree with what http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile;_ylt=AnT8Qu6KE0N_cIu93wLA4H3W7BR.;_ylv=3?show=AA10295984 said. I have no idea what you are asking.
2007-10-13 12:48:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋