English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Will we have defective zippers in the oral office, murdered lawyers on a park bench, missing papers under her bed, and an economy headed into the tanks when she once again steals all the furniture out of the Whitehouse?

2007-10-13 08:55:07 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

absolutely...more of the same...LOTS MORE

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

2007-10-13 09:36:46 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 3

No, because it was what it was then, but having said that, you may be on to something...could Hillary have been behind most of the goings on during the 8 years? Or at least have orchestrated a lot of the stuff (not the murders, right?), with the exception of Monica? Bill probably needed some much needed stress relief having to deal with Hillary anyhow.
She is a bright woman, however, and probably could run the country very well if her direction remained in the interests of the people.

2007-10-13 09:10:31 · answer #2 · answered by TT01 3 · 1 1

She's far more liberal than Bill Clinton. He actually did a decent job as far as the economy goes by keeping the deficit in check, although he could have done even better, and he understood and fought for free trade. But Hillary is more along the lines of Kerry and Gore, basically a socialist who would attempt to give us a "nanny-state" much like the countries of Western Europe. Ask them how things are going over there.

2007-10-13 09:18:03 · answer #3 · answered by The Scorpion 6 · 1 1

i'm quite excited with regard to the assumption of her being our next super President! purely the fact by myself that a woman would be President is something to be excited approximately! i think she would be able to offer a sparkling, new perspective to human beings because of the fact the chief of the US. i think, along with her techniques, remarkable issues would be carried out and no person will go through anymore, ever returned. Hillary is unquestionably the respond we are all so desperately searching for. on the same time as all the different applicants appear like clever, elementary, and hardworking human beings too, i think of Hillary is the epitome of all that and extra. enable's shop united statesa. working solid and vote for her in '08!

2016-12-18 06:39:38 · answer #4 · answered by kreitman 4 · 0 0

hi there


Again politics are very crooked now these days what can we say concerning those issues once elected. We need a strong government ,president ,new laws that make sense not just words he/she said. someone for the people and about the people not for the money and towards themselves. It's time for a real change not games but who will hear our voices if many do not even care it's all the same to them.


be well be safe god bless

2007-10-13 10:22:49 · answer #5 · answered by sugarlove_one 4 · 0 0

Yep! The economy was in the tank, and it's not now? The next president will inherit the bill for Bush's $9 trillion debt, wars that weren't handled right or shouldn't have been fought, a tax cut that shouldn't have been given, a dollar that isn't worth 50 cents overseas, and massive home foreclosures. What self-respecting individual would want to run? Maybe that was GWB's plan: make things so bad nobody would want the job.

2007-10-13 09:09:40 · answer #6 · answered by James S 4 · 4 2

I would take clinton's problems x 10 rather than what we got the last 7 years. I'll bet she doesn't play footsie with saudi and egyptian facists and kiss the butts of dictators like Putin and Musharraf like Bush and Cheney.

2007-10-13 09:01:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

That is a lot better than losing thousands of young men in a needless war. Give me hilary anytime over the crooks we current have. Hilary did not have an affair in the oval office.
Get over it she is the next president.

2007-10-13 09:08:48 · answer #8 · answered by Steven 6 · 5 2

You have Bush now and are in danger of getting Clinton Take Two in the future......I'm glad I'm not living in the USA

2007-10-13 09:03:23 · answer #9 · answered by Ferret 5 · 2 1

I think hers could be worse, he was limited by the fact that they did not want to go to far to the left as to jeopardize her future run for the Presidency.

2007-10-13 09:19:51 · answer #10 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers