2007-10-13 08:07:00 · 6 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I agree with Cheney of 94 not the one of 2003
2007-10-13 08:10:22 · answer #1 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Saddam should have been removed from power during the first Gulf War, but here we are 10 years later cleaning up a mess that SHOULD have been handled back in 1991. Now liberals insist that we pull out of Iraq. Why? So we can go back to Iraq in ANOTHER 10 years to clean up ANOTHER mess because once again we never finished the job? Let's hurry up and get this over with so we don't have to go back every decade or so, cleaning up messes left over from our last go around.
2007-10-13 15:11:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I do.
I strongly believe that our policies of inaction and no effective response to the numerous terror attacks against Americans all over the globe directly led to the terrorists' belief that they could pretty much do what they pleased with impunity - and that mindset culminated in the events of 9/11.
2007-10-13 15:15:06 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush 1 listened to his advisors and Bush 2 didn't listen to any body.
2007-10-13 15:12:18 · answer #4 · answered by John 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree with both of them, I just think that Bush Sr. should have been a little more forceful.
http://www.truewordtoday.blogspot.com
2007-10-13 15:10:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
2 different issues...the 1st gulf war was about iraq invading a soveriegn country the second was about removing a derranged lunatic...It would be better to compare our invasion of germany in wwII to the current war...
2007-10-13 15:10:49 · answer #6 · answered by coco d 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋