2007-10-13 08:01:57 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This administration believes they are answering to a higher power - one that is known, apparently, only by them and in whom they have complete faith - conservatives, generally, don't look into the future, so repercussions about anything they do is always a surprise to them.
2007-10-13 08:07:54 · answer #1 · answered by Ben 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not a day goes by that I am not tempted to start posting quotes from leading democrats about Iraq's WMD program, or when I find myself reminding people that CLinton fired cruise missiles at suspected WMD sites in Iraq as late as December 1998. In fact, Saddam Hussein was public enemy #1 until Bush took office. Then as soon as Bush took office he was "contained" and no viable threat. Go figure!
2007-10-13 08:09:07 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And he never expected that the left would totally turn on him...wake up folks! I am just about ready to draw the line and the sand...I am afraid, we are heading for another civil war if we don't stop this blame America, hate America first. It is OK to have differences, but how DARE you morons on the left disparage your own President.
By-the-way..if there is another civil war...and the conservatives WILL win, you libs can have the entire damn state of California!...oh, and I forgot Mass..LOL
2007-10-13 08:26:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I thought that the phrase "lie based war" had run its course - apparently there are still people who continue to disseminate this lie.
For what its worth - if there were any validity to this phrase, it would incriminate the whole Congress for not impeaching Bush.
2007-10-13 08:10:22 · answer #4 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
they have all lied. yet in terms of severity of the lies and the implications they have introduced in this united states of america i might say the worst became Bush 2. he will bypass down in historic previous as a results of fact the worst president this united states of america has ever considered. 2nd is Reagan as a results of fact of each and all the lies approximately his slicing taxes, investment terrorists to loose the hostages in Iran, and the investment of the Contras while in actuality it became a criminal offense. He did alot of alternative depraved issues too that led to harm to many human beings in this united states of america and out of doorways of this united states of america alongside with the apartheid government of South Africa on the time and denying investment of aids examine and saving human beings's lives from that terrible ailment. third is Nixon for obtrusive reasons alongside with the bombing of Cambodia, Watergate, and for amping up the Viet Nam conflict previously congress finally decrease off investment. 4th became Bush a million, returned for mendacity regarding the 1st gulf conflict and reasons for going there. He gave Saddam the bypass forward to invade Kuwait and then demonized him after Saddam invaded. He became additionally in charge for investment the two aspects of the Iranian/Iraqie conflict that bring about using chemical weapons by potential of Saddam which we help him get from the Germans. 5th Clinton. Lied approximately Lewinsky, that's obtrusive. yet he additionally signed directly to Nafta and the welfare reform bill that is going to harm alot of human beings in this financial melancholy we are headed into. I under no circumstances depended on Clinton. he's far to narcissistic. All politicians are yet he truly truly is fairly narcissistic.
2016-10-22 06:54:39 · answer #5 · answered by jeremie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush 1 was defeated in his re-election bid precisely because he failed to "finish the job" in Iraq. The American people did not approve.
That's why we elected Bush 2, to get Saddam
2007-10-13 08:09:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because our current president is no statesman.
I strongly disliked the first Pres Bush, but his son is several orders of magnitude worse for our country.
Never thought I'd see myself write anything like that, but there it is.
2007-10-13 08:11:34 · answer #7 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What lie based war? Bush never lied and congress had access to what ever they needed.
http://www.truewordtoday.blogspot.com
2007-10-13 08:06:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Clinton told Bush that Sadam had WMD's and that he was a threat.
Did he do that just just get Hillary elected?
2007-10-13 08:05:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I doubt he considered anything when it came to Iraq.He didn't consider the UN inspection,he didn't consider decades of ethnic tension and he didn't consider the death toll
2007-10-13 08:07:07 · answer #10 · answered by RX 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋