English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Come on now, look at this guy he looks like he has some serious issues to work out with himself. Anyone with the last name of Gore cannot be good. The only thing that I can think of that rhymes with Gore is Blood. This guy is going to trade us in for our souls. Where is Ross Perot when you need him?

2007-10-13 07:40:38 · 22 answers · asked by techno_junki 2 in Politics & Government Elections

I know blood doesnt ryhme! All I am trying to say that this guy is not showing his true colors and could turn out to be another Kerry or Bush.

2007-10-13 07:51:50 · update #1

If Gore is our only hope, I might as well vote for Oprah Winfrey. At least then we know that we would not have any homeless or starving people in the United States.

2007-10-13 07:56:48 · update #2

22 answers

I wouldn't.

2007-10-13 07:48:00 · answer #1 · answered by New Jersey Steve 5 · 3 0

Al Gore is not much different then Micheal Moore. No one disputes CO2 emissions can cause global warming but those are not the only forces at work on our world. Solar Cycles have a much larger impact on "global warming". The Earth has experienced warming and cooling periods during its existence. For example: Greenland is called Greenland for a reason, long before the industrial age it was not a barren snow covered island. There are other examples. Al Gore presents what he wants you to believe, not the entire picture. There are many scientists that believe solar cycles are the primary reason the earth is warming. But Gore does not want to hear that, so he will omit it. I do agree we need to use resources wisely but we also need honest people to present all sides of issues that impact our world so we all can make the best decision.

2007-10-13 07:57:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Al Gore grow to affix the priority - he grow to affix the Clinton administration that did no longer foresee terrorism being a controversy interior the destiny, did no longer go with to go after Osama while that they had him of their attractions... Al Gore has no longer had an unique concept because of the fact the 1980's. he's previous college politics - does no longer comprehend his very own techniques, and if he did, does no longer be waiting to speak what grow to be in that addled head. once you're saying which you long for the success of the ninety's - only bear in mind it grow to be because of the fact Ronald Reagan and the Republicans geared up up our national risk-free practices to the component that we've been risk-free, till bill and Al got here across it mandatory to dismantle it. those 2 spent all of their time sweating out their in one day approval scores, and taking credit for a reliable financial gadget that they had no longer something to do with arising - Reagan's tax cuts and the dismantling of the Soviet Union helped enable for that. ought to you think of the wailing and the gnashing of the teeth that could have taken place if a Republican have been interior the White residing house while the tech bubble burst? we'd nonetheless be dealing with Enron like trials and all kinds of investigations... i do no longer see a unmarried Dem with any guts or backbone or smarts adequate to do the activity. Al Gore might have had us connect as much as that ridiculous Kyoto treaty that could have handicapped each US industry and thrown us into the dark a while... you have Al, do only no longer unharness that loser on the rest human beings. You liberal Democrats have confident your self that 9/11 grow to be an anomoly that won't be able to take place returned, and it grow to be your reckless, selfish stupidity that allowed that to take place interior the 1st place. All bill's humorous business enterprise with China is the explanation why the huge silos grew up betwixt the CIA and FBI - provided that they had the airborne dirt and dust on bill. the girl who drew up the protocol so as that the two agencies ought to no longer consult from a minimum of one yet another had the gall to take a seat down on the 9/11 value and blame Bush for all of it - Democrats are disloyal, and don't belong working this u . s .. Al Gore, please go re-invent the internet, yet go away this huge u . s . on my own.

2016-12-14 16:45:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

He is not running at the moment, so I could not vote for him, but having said that, if he runs, he will have to convince me to vote for him, just as all the rest, Liberal and Conservative must do now. And you are right, we need another 'Ross Perot' to get in the mix again, even if it screws up the vote...maybe, just maybe, a 'ross' will get enough interested to make a difference!

2007-10-13 07:50:53 · answer #4 · answered by basport_2000 5 · 0 0

Fmr VP Al Gore is finally ready to be President. He has proven that Global Warming is a Major Threat to National Security !

2007-10-14 18:23:12 · answer #5 · answered by Dale B 3 · 0 1

I wouldn't!! end of story.

Someone is trying to rationalize Gore?.. He is a hypocrite! He tells us to conserve energy and walk and bike to work, yet he flies in a PRIVATE JET instead of flying in a commercial airline. I guess he is better than us. Also his house is 5x the average americans house, and he has a few homes. I guess he doesn't need to practice what he preaches! Then there is the issue of the non-facts in his movie! ummm i mean documentary! HA

2007-10-13 07:49:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I see no reason to vote for Gore. He was attached to the hip of the Clintons, and still is. I will never vote to put a Clinton Clone in office.

2007-10-13 08:00:46 · answer #7 · answered by lilly4 6 · 1 0

I would not vote for Al gore...I just wrote a whole thesis on why I didn't vote for him in 2000 in another answer.

2007-10-13 21:17:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Al Gore won the last election. Probably getting unfairly screwed out of it was the best thing that has happened. His movie has opened people up to the reality of what the world is becoming. He is doing a most important job now. I hope he doesn't run and sticks with it.

2007-10-13 07:54:21 · answer #9 · answered by BillParkhurst 4 · 0 3

Because he would be a better choice than anyone who is running now, that has a chance!
Notice I said has a chance!
If nobody else runs and things are as they are now I'll vote for Ron Paul!

2007-10-13 08:39:03 · answer #10 · answered by Working Man 6 · 0 0

If we want to live in a socialist state, Gore or Hillary are perfect choices.

2007-10-13 07:49:03 · answer #11 · answered by midiman77 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers