2007-10-13 06:52:26 · 22 answers · asked by colin 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why do you think a Noble Prize means anything? Yasser Arafat won the Noble Peace Prize if you want proof they are meaningless. I really can't say if he COULD be a good President or not. We can't say that until they LEAD. Heck U.S. Grant was a GREAT General in the Civil war, but a lousy President. See how being good in one field doesn't mean you will be a good President.
2007-10-13 07:01:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is unfortunate that Al Gore got to share in the Nobel Prize as it lends credence to his nonsense that mankind is responsible for the global warming that the earth is currently undergoing. Gore is a one trick pony, without enough gray matter to cogently and cleverly invent an idea of his own. He was a do nothing vice president, he will be a do less president... BUT if I had to choose between Hillary who would work hard turn this country into a socialist nation, or Al Gore, who hasn't the ingenuity, or the ambition to effect needed changes in our nation... I would Always coose Al Gore... Fortunately, I'm a Goldwater republican, and will vote the conservative, republican ticket.
2007-10-13 14:03:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No and never. Al Gore first of all SUCKS! He is more interested in promoting awareness about global warming and really doesn't give a crap about the presidency. Second even if you win the Nobel Prize it doesn't put you up in fame and makes you a good candidate for running for president.
2007-10-13 13:56:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Im still hoping for that great nobel prize winner Kofi Annan to be us president. his work with places like darfur, rwanda and things like the huge success that was the oil for food program shows he was not only the best nobel prize winner, he should actually be the leader of the free world. with the Goracle as his first mate ofcourse.
2007-10-13 14:00:38 · answer #4 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course he could be good president. The person who gets noble prize for noble cause is best suitable for the job of president.
2007-10-13 13:57:13 · answer #5 · answered by Ritesh Shah 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
A persons qualifications are not defined by any outside body or how many personality contests one wins.
The qualities of a President is determined by his ability to run the business of the nation.
2007-10-13 14:00:01 · answer #6 · answered by CFB 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ROFLMAO
No but he invented the Internet. Arafat has a better chance of being the US president, what's that you say, Arafat is dead? Like I said, Arafat has a better chance.
2007-10-13 14:28:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heck no!
It's not hard at all to win the Nobel Peace Prize today.
Why?
You just have to be a liberal, anti-American, communist/ dictator lover, white male hater, and a traditional family hater.
Isn't that so sad?
Now, you may say, how do I know those are the qualification need to win the Nobel Peace Prize.
All you have to do is look at the winners of it.
2007-10-13 13:55:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
I think he could be a good president. He actually cares about something that matters. He was supposed to be president instead of Bush. or that s what the rumors are...
2007-10-13 13:56:17 · answer #9 · answered by modbride 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
he is going to get us out of iraq, lower the gas prices, and make these gas guzzlers fewer so we can breathe fresh air. it getting worse and worse everyday, if not just the air, my wallet cries every time my car asks for more gas...so yeah he will be the comeback president, just like the good ole' Clinton...
2007-10-13 13:57:58 · answer #10 · answered by Moe 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋