Or are you still having trouble getting over Gore getting more votes than Bush in 2000?
2007-10-13 05:02:16 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bert, you left out, "Hollyweirdos should stay out of politics - except for Fred Thompson, Ahnold Schwarzeneggar, Sonny Bono, Ronald Reagan..."
2007-10-13 05:14:49 · update #1
#1 Con, learn your facts. The 1960 election was very close but Kennedy won both the popular and electoral votes.
2007-10-13 05:18:34 · update #2
Neither one annoys me, Mr. Gore, is correct about his theories relating to global warming, the same theories that environmental scientists have been reporting for years, but no one in our government paid any attention to them.
Mr. Gore, if he decides to officially 'toss-his-hat' into the political arena for the presidential race in 2008, will probably win by a landslide! I feel he was an excellent Vice President and I also feel that he would make an outstanding president.
He would reduce and/or eliminate the massive problems with global warming by introducing new technologies that would eliminate this problem, but still allow all of us to continue to enjoy and use electricity for all our creature comforts.
I am neither a Democrate or a Republician, nor am I an Independent, have not found the political party that will solve the primary problems affecting all of us in the United Staes or the world.
But, I do try to express my opinions on subjects that are of immediate interest to me, but only when I am asked, such as with your question.
If there is something I like about what a Republician wants to do if elected, or that of a Democrat, or even a Independent, then I will watch that person's political agenda to see if there are other attractive points of view.
Thank you for allowing me to express my opinions!
2007-10-13 05:23:48 · answer #1 · answered by libertybell 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm....Maybe they too busy being ashamed that Bushy isn't being allowed on the Campaign trail for the Repubs to even notice Gore just got awarded.
Thanks for giving them the update.
By the way, Gore may have won the Nobel, but Cheney struck it rich with an Oil War. So why all the shame??? Cons should be so proud! (Not)
2007-10-13 05:38:52 · answer #2 · answered by ... 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither. I hope he deserved these awards.
May he bless the world as a statesman instead of trying again to be commander in chief.
I think he beat out a nice lady from here in Canada for the Nobel Prize, but I am still happy for him anyway.
2007-10-13 13:10:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither bothers me. If Mr. Gore won the awards, he deserves praise.
On the election, in retrospect, I wish he would have continued the fight for the office. This country did not deserve the ridicule the sitting individual took us through. I'm hoping we will get a leader we deserve in the next election, be he/she Republican or Democrat or Independent.
2007-10-13 05:14:35 · answer #4 · answered by James S 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I am happy
Shows how silly liberals are.
George Bush is the only person to beat a Nobel prize, and Oscar winner for the job as a president. Speaks very well of him.
Poor Al Gore, can win an Nobel prize but not an election.
2007-10-13 05:06:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Al Gore's election as President in 2000 annoys them more.
2007-10-13 05:09:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yeah and Nixon didn't contest the election because he wanted to do what was best for the COUNTRY. Too bad we can't say that of Gore. Anyway what annoys me most is that people believe this pompous windbag without bothering to listen to the EVIDENCE from the other side.
2007-10-13 06:54:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Al Gore
2007-10-13 05:05:43 · answer #8 · answered by G2 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Awards are often given for fiction and comedy. Some are also withdrawn. If an athlete has to forfeit awards because of doping, Al Gore may have to return his awards when it is overwhelmingly confirmed that he is a fraud and a huckster.
I remember he said he invented the internet, may be he will invent a cure for all our problems after someone else finds those cures.
2007-10-13 05:25:54 · answer #9 · answered by Charles S 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
What really annoys me is when people fall for this hoax, Al is not an actor, but wins an Oscar, and Al is not a scientist, but is regarded as the foremost authority on global warming. Then Al claims you cannot believe scientists who disagree with him because they are paid by the evil corporations, and then you look at Al's income for the last 6 years and see he has made hundreds of millions off of global warming.
2007-10-13 05:05:30 · answer #10 · answered by Curtis 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋