Although Gorebal warming is just a hoax , and if this is why algore got the Nobel "Piece" Prize , for inventing a threat that doesn`t exist then the award doesn`t really matter . After all the courts in Great Britain have removed his farce of a movie from being shown in their schools` about Gorebal Warming , because no less than 9 of algores` claims in his movie have been proven false or they have no basis of scientific fact to support them , you know ; LIES` !. Of course this is not reported by the Liberal Socialist Bias` Media , and the loons`that depend on the Bias` Media to enlighten them continue to have only one path to travel down , being to stubborn or to lazy to find out facts for themselves . They just accept everything that the Liberal Socialist Bias` Media says`as the gospel of the ignorant ! Believing something that has been proven to be a lie or things that are made up , is the end of reasoning !
2007-10-13 05:39:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
You got it they could not get closer to be a mainline liberal organization for twenty years. I think in the past Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II should of been strongly considered for the prize if not receiving them for both's work to break the Cold War and the Soviet lock on Eastern Europe. The Pope also was always speaking out against war and human rights violations. But both were too conservative for the Nobel committee and thus it could not take its shot at the US and conservatism by handing them the awards.
2007-10-13 16:01:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
It was sad to give the award to someone who doesn't follow his own lesson. They should have given the award to someone that has an energy efficient house, doesn't own the most polluted personal jet, and actually is trying to live a moral life. Hypocracy doesn't seem to matter in the award criteria.
2007-10-13 20:41:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Steve C 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
It should be called .
The liars club and dictators and mass murderers award.
jimmy Carter anti Jewish, Stalin mass murderer, Hitler same, Yasar Arafat same
Al Bore the king of Doom and Gloom
2007-10-13 16:30:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Jimmy Carter, Yasser Arafat, Al Gore. Where's the prestige gone?
2007-10-13 11:59:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋
Yes because he was caught lying about global warming facts.
2007-10-13 12:43:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Apostle Jeff 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
You forget that one of the winners of the Nobel Peace Prize was Henry Kissinger. Hardly one that I would call a Liberal. I hate to join the band wagon but these prizes go to Liberals more because in reality Liberals DO MORE. Conservatives are very good at complaining about the way things are. They are very bad about changing things. Atlease in changing things for the good.
2007-10-13 12:09:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brady E 3
·
4⤊
7⤋
no it should not be change.but is it not ironic,how even though you do not see the merit in some thing,you feel it should be ignored,while i am certainly not a fan of GORE,MANY OF US NEED TO STOP ATTACKING THESE MESSENGERS ,BECAUSE THEY WILL PASS,BUT LET US WORK ON THE MESSAGE, WE DO HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO DO A BETTER JOB WITH HOW WE MANAGE THINGS ON THE EARTH.
2007-10-13 13:24:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by lildreamer 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
That would be appropriate for it will automatically exclude war mongering,violence loving,money grubbing monumental hypocritical and morally bankrupt conservatives especially the social conservative dangerous Christian fundies like BUSH who CHOSE to wage a filthy stinking illegal war atrocity in Iraq ALL BASED UPON A PACK OF VILE FILTHY LIES that has so far resulted in the slaughter of over 400,000 INNOCENT Iraqi civilians including that Muslim Iraqi mother caught on video going around with a shovel sweeping up the body parts of her 5 year old child in order to give the child a burial.
You get all that dearie??
2007-10-13 12:02:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
7⤋
I love it.
That is what it represents whether they change the name or not.
2007-10-14 10:29:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋