When the primaries roll around, all of us should be shocked and appalled, if Ron Paul is not nominated. Rudy Ghoul-iani and John McCan't hold no candle to the peace and freedom movement. The media is showing Rudy, Fred, and John so much more, it will show the ineptitude full force in these next 3 months. Rudy, can only talk about 9-11 or NYC, nothing about any promise for future in this country, only the fact under his
watch, the city burned and 3 thousand people died.
Republicans are supposed to want to give the people lower taxes, more freedoms, and keep government out of the business of peoples everyday lives. Only one candidate shares these beliefs, Ron Paul.
Any Republican not showing favor towards Ron Paul, can look in the mirror and know they are no longer Republicans. They will have become what they believe they are fighting, a mind controlled, slave, of fundamentalist beliefs. Meaning, no Republican besides Ron Paul is even close to the intent of the Republican Part (GOP). Let alone, no Republican is close to understanding the founding document of this country, The Constitution.
If, the Republicans want a nominee to increase taxes, increase spending, keep the racial divide through entitlement programs, and keep the continued decline of our economy, pick Ghoul-iani, McCan't, Romney, Brownback, Tancredo, or Thompson.
In my opinion, we will find a new batch of cross over Republicans, from the independents and democrats. These 2 groups have been largely ignored by their parties, just as the Republicans have been ditched by the leaders of their party.
Democrats won congress and senate races last year, but have not delivered any hope for peace or change. I have a good feeling, many of the discouraged fringe voters will have a huge impact in this race.
In conclusion, true republicans will support Ron Paul when they understand the message. I feel many are confused by the media bias, and have not made their own conclusion, but are letting the media draw it for them. There is only one Republican on the stage, Ron Paul for President!!
2007-10-13 06:18:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Xenu 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
First he hasn't a snowballs chance in hell to win the primary.
My biggest fear however is he will be the spoiler in the election. The same way Ross Perot was in 1992.
If Ron Paul loses the Republican primary ( not if but when ,really) the if is , IF he then runs as an independent he could draw away enough votes from the viable Republican candidate , thus splitting the conservative vote and handing the election to the Democrats on a silver platter. They could win with 41 % of the vote as Bill Clinton did in 92.
Actually I believe that is what is afoot here. Conspiricy?
.
2007-10-13 05:09:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I will say there is a little difference in the attitude of the media towards paul with a little more fair reporting in the past week -if it lasts you may see more and more repubs coming on board -also the alternative is always a democrat and I know that repubs would rather deal with four years of small govt and balanced budgets ( thats what most claim will be all he would be able to do in the current system if elected ) than anything the dems have planned
2007-10-13 04:53:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by rooster 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
They'd grumble about it until realizing that it's him or Hillary.
Snark aside, I think the enthusiastic support would be from different parts of the party - the flipside of the neocon regime we've had for the last two terms.
I don't think freedom is as popular as Dr. Paul or I think it ought to be - I think a big portion of the presidential electorate wants to hear about how the candidate is going to 'fix things' like health care or schools. The Constitutional approach he uses I wholeheartedly support, but I know he's paddling upstream with the American public.
2007-10-13 04:59:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Doc Occam 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
the reason in the back of the primaries and social gathering conventions is to locate the suited candidate in the social gathering to symbolize them interior the ordinary election. So, of course, whilst each and every of the weeding is carried out, the social gathering will come mutually and maximum will suport the social gathering candidate. in case you may no longer, then you definately are unfastened to vote for anybody interior the ordinary election. although as we've considered, in the journey that your no longer Republican or Democrat, you have a snowballs threat in hell of adjusting into president in this u . s .. we've a firmly entrenched 2 social gathering equipment that penalizes outsiders.
2016-11-08 04:49:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by prottsman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Christian Republican's will support anyone with any agenda as long as they say the word prolife.
I trust Ron Paul more than many of the other Republican candidates. I like how he is exposing corporatism. Corporatism like that which sends US jobs to aboard slavery-like sweatshops. He is starting to sound like a broken record. I like him better than top lawyer/mafia background - Juliani, better than Stock market money Romney, and better than 23% sales tax fair for the wealthy Huckabee.
Prolifers should call themselves Christians opposing Women's Rights, because that life only applies to unborn. Born children and women's lives are not important. Once a child is born they aren't of value to prolifers, or prolifers would be adopting 108 million orphaned children. No so-called prolifers privacy with their own blood is more important.
Mothers who can only afford to feed their children and not themselves, can't afford another child that isn't wanted by anyone. Mothers need to be able to protect their own life so that they can protect their born children.
Women need to keep full rights, including the right to privacy. Women need to be able to choose with whatever her religion, what is best for her life and her family. Women need full medical options.
2007-10-13 05:20:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mike 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
I am republican and I support Ron Paul for president!!!
2007-10-13 05:44:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by ()()()()()() 1
·
3⤊
2⤋
He won't win. While he may be the only intelligent person running for the Presidency, many of his ideas are overboard and crazy. If he won the nomination, yes, I think republicans would support him since he received and won the nomination.
2007-10-13 04:50:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by x2000 6
·
5⤊
4⤋
Ron Paul will win the Republican nomination when pigs fly.
I'll be so glad when the first primary is over and Ron Paul finishes in single digits so that his fans will quit asking these questions. Of course, then they will say the primary was fixed.
2007-10-13 04:49:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
8⤋
I'm not a Republican, but I am supporting him.
2007-10-13 05:19:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
2⤊
2⤋