English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After watching Al Gores Oscar Winning Documentary and reading his biography, I have concluded that he would be a very influencial and beneficial man to have as a President?

Do you think he should become a candidate for the 2008 election?
Would he be a better President than George Bush?
Who would the American people vote for?
What are your views?

2007-10-13 03:49:21 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

16 answers

Most people who answer your question will be those who are opponents to Gore's political beliefs. They will bombard you with childish remarks, juvenile insults, and vulgar obscenities - all in reference to Gore being a 'dem' or a 'commie' or a 'liberal'. Their comments will be filled with hatred, bias, prejudice and bigotry, but will have little to do with the fact that AL Gore has found a more important thing to do with his life than persue the evils and corruption of modern-day American politics.
He has sparked interest in a problem that is about to destroy this world as we know it. Yet, those who continue to covet their gas-guzzling Hummers and SUVs don't want to listen to the truth, so they attack Gore as a numbskull and doomsday prophet.
Scientists were warning about the ill effects of global warming long before Gore involved himself to deeply in the project. Still, 'ditto heads' prefer to listen to non-experts like a fanatical, Hitleresque Rush Limbaugh who only spews forth his toxic poison every day to lemmings that follow while Rush laughs all the way to the bank and keeps popping his prescription pills.
Gore would be a great President (much better than Rudy, Hillary, Barack or Mitt), but Republicans would use their entire play book of 'dirty tricks' to destroy his campaign.
I think Gore is better off to stay outside of politics and continue his quest toward trying to save the world from all of us gluttonous, selfish, environmentally uninformed, and decadent so-called citizens who only think about ourselves and our own creature comforts.
Arrogance, avarice and hubris has set in around the world, but especially in America where our materialistic lifestyles have conquered our common sense and global duty toward protecting the Earth and its future.
Our smoke-belching factories; vehicle emissions; refusal to REduce, REuse and REcycle; disregard for natural resources; intrusive coal mining; untethered oil drilling; careless use of chemicals; refusal to use mopeds, bicycles, legs, or mass transportation; and an ignorance toward all other humans, plants and animals so necessary to our own survival on this planet have all contributed to the demise of what once was a patriotic, compassionate, peace-loving society. -RKO- 10/13/07

2007-10-13 04:10:31 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 3 4

House #1
A 20 room mansion ( not including 8 bathrooms heated by natural gas. Add on a pool ( and a pool house) and a
separate guest house, all heated by gas.

In one month this residence consumes more energy than the average American household does in a year. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2400.
In natural gas alone, this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home.

This house is not situated in a Northern or Midwestern "snow belt" area. It's in the South.
~~~
House #2

Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university.

This house incorporates every "green" feature current home construction can provide.

The house is 4,000 square feet ( 4 bedrooms ) and is nestled on an arid, high prairie in the American southwest.

A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat-pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F. ) heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer.

The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or
natural gas and it consumes one-quarter electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system.

Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then
irrigates the land surrounding the house.

Surrounding flowers and shrubs native to the area enable the property to blend into the surrounding rural landscape.

HOUSE #1 is outside of Nashville, Tennessee; it is the abode of the "environmentalist" Al Gore.

HOUSE #2 is on a ranch near Crawford, Texas; it is the residence the of the President of the United States, George W. Bush.

Links below back up the facts of the 2 houses.
http://www.tennesseepolicy.org/main/article.php?article_id=367

http://www.cowboysindians.com/articles/archives/1202/bush.html

An "inconvenient truth" about Al Gore, or what?

2007-10-13 05:12:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Al Gore hit the hole. 6 more weeks of global cooling.

2016-05-22 05:30:32 · answer #3 · answered by tamra 3 · 0 0

No, No, Definitely No (He once said that global warming would destroy the world before the year 2000), The other guy, and I dont agree with everything either party does, but I sure dont think Al Gore even comes close to being president material. The only reason anyone would vote for him would be that they will not vote republican.

2007-10-13 03:54:30 · answer #4 · answered by Doggzilla 6 · 4 3

About the time when we think Al Gore is gone he pops again.

Everything he says is basically false.

Global warming is a myth.What a hypocrite. He should practice what he preaches....

He claims to have " taken the initiative and invented the internet" ( I invented the paper clip and the remote control, too).He was called the Ozone Man 15 years ago.

Have you noticed that he looks like Mark Furhman in the eyes? I am not trying to make fun of him but it does seem odd that they both have that interesting distinction.

2007-10-13 04:11:12 · answer #5 · answered by mary 6 · 2 3

Al Gore is a hypocrite. He claimed to have invented the Internet.
His wife Tipper Gore received a lot of attention advocated censorship of rock and rap music 20 years ago

Gore wants us to walk and ride bicycles to work while he flys around in private jets that gulp thousands of gallons of fuel per hour.

He accused Bush of stealing the election when he tried to win it by flooding the Florida State supreme court with lawyers demanded recounts until he got a favorable one. Thank God the US Supreme court ended that madness and Gores political career.
Gore is a loser and the Euros that gave him an award are socialist rascals.

2007-10-13 04:06:08 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 4 3

Hell no, I hate that guy..
He is stupid, and made that crap of a movie on global warming just for the politics and money.
Global warming has about 2% to do with humans..the earth has a natural heating/cooling period.
Look, the Ice age happened from cooling, then it warmed up (wait, there were no humans then, putting carbon into the o-zone--so that means it happened Naturally, not from humans); so the ice melted, most of it stayed up North/South in antartica.

Now he is saying that WE are the main cause of warming, but the Earth does this NATURALLY.
Look at history, and see the pattern of hot-cool-warm-etc..

My opinion, you don't have to agree with it.

If he became president, or clinton, or obama, then I would move from U.S.
-M♪tt

2007-10-13 03:56:08 · answer #7 · answered by Erunno 5 · 5 2

I agree. He would make an ideal candidate for the election.
And the question would he be a better President than Bush..... to right he would. But then again so would most of the American population.

2007-10-13 04:01:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

I personally think that but for the farce of the U.S. electoral system, He would be the President now. As far as I can see Al Gore is the nearest thing to intelligence in the United States. My view.

2007-10-13 03:55:37 · answer #9 · answered by Raymo 6 · 2 4

No I do not like him even though I am a card caring Democrat! He has no personality!
No I do not think he should become a candidate I think he should go awayy far awa y...
I dunno I think they both pretty much suck @$$!
Um they would write in a different name all together lol!
Those are my views!

2007-10-13 04:02:28 · answer #10 · answered by Lori M 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers