Is there going to be a recount for the Nobel Prize? Neocons claiming theres hanging chads for Bush?

Question

Will Justices Thomas and Renquist and Scalia award the Nobel Prize to George Bush despite the end result of the counting of the votes?

Answer 1

Unfortunately there is no Nobel prize for invading a country and screwing everything up. That is Bushes only chance.

Answer 2

The Court Already Decided....


Maybe you could explain to me why the British High court found that his film can't be shown without "Guidance Note" to show the inaccuracies in his film or that a think tank is reviewing his Oscar because of it???

*Think tank: Withdraw Gore film's Oscar
Citing court ruling, compares situation to sports stars found to be 'cheats'*


"The truth, as inconvenient as it is to Al Gore, is that his so-called documentary contained critical distortions that are quite contrary to the principles of good documentary journalism," Newman said. "Good documentaries should be factually correct. Clearly this documentary is not."

"An Inconvenient Truth" won Oscars in 2006 for best documentary and best original song.

Dimmock took the British government to court after then-Environment Secretary David Miliband launched a plan to send "An Inconvenient Truth" to all British schools, announcing the scientific debate over man-made global warming "is over."

The judge, however, sided with Dimmock, who alleged the documentary breached the Education Act of 1996 by portraying "partisan political views."

The court ruled the Guidance Notes to Teachers must make clear that:

* The film is a political work and promotes only one side of the argument.

* If teachers present the film without making this plain they may be in breach of section 406 of the Education Act 1996 and guilty of political indoctrination.

* Eleven inaccuracies have to be specifically drawn to the attention of school children.

The inaccuracies, according to the court, are:

1. The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.

2. The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The court found that the film was misleading: Over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.

3. The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.

4. The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.

5. The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr. Gore had misread the study: In fact four polar bears drowned, and this was because of a particularly violent storm.

6. The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream, throwing Europe into an ice age: The Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.

7. The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.

8. The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt, causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.

9. The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting; the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.

10. The film suggests that sea levels could rise by seven meters, causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact, the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40 centimeters over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.

11. The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

Answer 3

I don't believe a Conservative can win an award like the "Left Wing Man of the Year", aka the Nobel Prize.

Answer 4

no, the right tends to be a little more gracious in defeat than the left. they will criticize the choice to give the award to gore, but accept it as reality and move on, as opposed to the left which would whine and cry like little babies until they got their way.

Answer 5

Democrats are the only ones that demand recounts when they lose.


Oh and they try to throw out military votes.

And the results of every single recount had Gore losing.

Answer 6

No, conservatives realize the world is sometimes unjust and that playing fields are rarely level. Still, they are thankful of life's opportunities and will pick themselves up and move on, with nary a complaint.

Answer 7

Ill have to agree with the first poster on this question.

Answer 8

You are so funnnnnneeeeeee............go for it, man........