2007-10-13 02:58:57 · 10 answers · asked by Charlie D 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The fox noise chanel is so biased and stupid, it is amazing that they stay on the air. They are just upset that they can't the Warmonger Prize.
2007-10-13 03:02:59 · answer #1 · answered by Future Citizen of Forvik 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I just wonder why in the entire movie,Jesu..I mean Al Gore didn't mention that there is complete,total,undeniable scientific consensus that the Earth has warmed and cooled repeatedly throughout history.This is a fact debated by no one.It seems that might be a relevant little tidbit to include in a documentary about climate change,ya know,telling the audience climate change has happened before,in fact,it is ALWAYS happening.There is no "normal"temperature of the Earth,the CLIMATE is ALWAYS in flux.Now,seems to me.If he were interested in SCIENCE,he would've mentioned that.Maybe those undisputed facts were a little too "inconvenient"to include in his "Inconvenient truth".The only reason I can think of why he would omit such relevant information is that he had an agenda,other than simple truth,that these inconvenient facts got in the way of.So he omitted them and hoped no one would notice
2007-10-13 03:24:14 · answer #2 · answered by nobodinoze 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think of human beings have a suitable to their opinion and that i think information companies could rfile the information. the reality that different information companies did not rfile that "An Inconvenient fact" lied tells me that different information companies are actually not reporting objectively and are propagandizing the information. interior the united kingdom it truly is against the regulation to characterize something as being real while that's not real. interior the U. S. the regulations are lots looser and permit for many extra selection. by potential of advertising the action picture "An Inconvenient fact" as a documentary and by potential of representing many of the lies interior the action picture as being data, whilst not specifically putting forward that they have got been data, the action picture skirted the regulation interior the U. S. and broke the regulation interior the united kingdom. As stated, interior the united kingdom in case you characterize something as a actuality that's comparable to asserting it truly is a actuality. A legal action became introduced against the action picture "An Inconvenient fact" as a results of fact it misrepresented itself as a actuality based documentary to the human beings of the united kingdom. The decide discovered that the action picture did incorporate "egregious errors" and that the action picture had misrepresented itself as real. Fox suggested this. different networks interior the U. S. desperate to not rfile that the action picture Al Gore gained a Nobel Prize for became not a documentary. Al Gore did not get carry of the Nobel Prize for generating a documentary. Al Gore gained the prize for bringing a "severe worldwide project" to standard interest. the reality that the action picture "An inconvenient fact" is legally not a documentary and is barely a production of propaganda does not exchange the reality that the flow has introduced standard interest to the belief of world Warming. real, multiple human beings do not think of liars could be rewarded with as prestigious a reward as a Nobel Prize, yet, the prize became not provided for telling the reality and Nobel Prizes are so left wing political at the instant they don't seem to be considered as prestigious as they as quickly as have been.
2016-10-22 06:14:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe they and others are just pointing out the "inconvenient truth" of Gore's hypocrisy. If he really cared about going green, he would reduce his own huge carbon footprint by not wasting so much electriciy at his home and not jetting all over the world in his private plane.
If God wants to destroy the world through "global warming" or any means (he already did it once with the Great Flood), there's nothing we puny humans can to do save it, and if He wants it preserved, there's nothing we can do to destroy it.
We should be good steward's of God's creation, but we shouldn't worship the earth.
Gore claims to be a Christian; so why doesn't he know this, too? I guess he just doesn't believe the "inconvenient truths" in the Bible.
2007-10-13 03:08:16 · answer #4 · answered by arklatexrat 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
A good leader , leads by example and not just when it's convenient. People who have been fighting for green living are bashing Gore as because although Gore has been preaching green living and global warming for over twenty years Gore has never taken steps in his own life to live green.... He didn't start "greening" his houses until the critics started bashing him last fall.. He of all people has had the financial resources to have afforded a green life for over twenty years...Many of us can't afford solar and wind mills but he has always been able to.. We can't afford electric cars etc... but he has always been able to and it wasn't until he was getting bashed this past winter and fall that he choose to start taking tiny steps to live green.He drives SUVs , FLys private planes and owns multiple estates with acres of cleared land >>>gore plant some trees on your estates......
Ed bagley jr. Has been living and speaking out about living green for over twenty years...He won't stay at hotels or eat in returants that can't prove they recycle and use recycled, He has been living it!!!!!!!! Gore is a political mouth piece that only preaches what will earn him attention...
2007-10-13 03:15:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I have no respect for the award once terrorist Arafat was awarded it.
What does terrorism have to do with peace?
The award lost all meaning that day.
I do not care what Fox News says, anyone with a brain can see why this award is meaningless
2007-10-13 03:04:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They don't care about truth. If they could make a profit off of global warming they would be all over it and Al Gore would be their poster boy.
These people smear anything that doesn't agree with their narrow twisted views.
2007-10-13 03:03:08 · answer #7 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
FNC is not smearing Al Gore. But that idiot deserves to be smeared for all the lies he spews.
2007-10-13 03:06:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, they are criticizing him for making it appear that global warming is the fault of conservative government.
2007-10-13 03:07:01 · answer #9 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
ditto arklatexrat
2007-10-13 03:09:32 · answer #10 · answered by KRR 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋