English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should there be government grants made available so every one can affor their own private jet?

2007-10-13 01:58:39 · 9 answers · asked by Brain 2 in News & Events Current Events

9 answers

i wish i owned a private jet:(

2007-10-13 02:01:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

For those who excuse AG hypocrisy; Gore has told us that Global warming is a CRISIS and needs to be attacked immediately. To me (and most people) a crisis says that we should not aggravate the situtation in any way even if we can pay it off with carbon offsets. This means that he should be living the lifestyle that he supports. The truth about carbon offsets; a tree planted now will not become an efficient filter of CO2 for about ten years of growth. Another sad reality if the tree already exists (and it does) then what have we gained? Whether we put it in a forest, park, or government complex it was still doing what it was going to do.

2016-05-22 05:19:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

If everyone can afford it they should - wait, there is a company starting where everyone will be able to fly in a private jet for the same price as flying on a conventional aircraft! so, yes.

2007-10-13 02:09:49 · answer #3 · answered by Al B 7 · 0 0

I do find that a little hypocritical too. All these politicians and activists want to preach to us about saving the planet, but then they go and fly in their private jets and drive their expensive cars that get like 14 miles to the gallon. They should lead by example too not just word of mouth.

2007-10-13 02:01:49 · answer #4 · answered by jm42445 5 · 3 2

Gore doesn't own a private jet....he flies commercial.

2007-10-14 03:36:56 · answer #5 · answered by Kimik610 1 · 0 1

Is everyone a Nobel Peace Prize winner? OK then.

2007-10-13 02:00:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

harold, your question is moot and insignificant, the government grants you talk of are reserved for bailouts of companies like chrysler, and defense contractors. kinda like rich mans welfare.

2007-10-13 02:12:19 · answer #7 · answered by darvosix 4 · 1 1

no, we should be spending all our money watching the "inconvenient truth" till our eyes bleed

2007-10-13 02:00:39 · answer #8 · answered by Twinkie Thief 7 · 2 1

Not if they care about environmental protection, they shouldn't.

2007-10-13 02:02:04 · answer #9 · answered by ruralsouthwell 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers